You are here:

Acceptance of Online Degrees by Undergraduate Mexican Students PROCEEDINGS

, University of Leicester, United Kingdom ; , Florida State University, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Lisbon, Portugal ISBN 978-1-880094-89-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

The quality and acceptance of online degree programs are still controversial issues. In Mexico, where the access to technology is limited, there are few studies on the matter. A survey was applied to 104 undergraduate students to evaluate their knowledge of virtual education, their likelihood of enrollment in an online degree program, and their acceptance of online degrees as adequate professional credentials. Results show that in general participants have a basic idea about e-learning, consider that face-to-face courses have a higher quality than distance classes, are open to the idea of enrolling in an online degree program, but regard traditional degrees as more adequate professional credentials in comparison to online equivalents. Further research is needed to increase our understanding of the comparative standing and acceptability of online degrees in developing countries like Mexico.

Citation

Padilla Rodriguez, B.C. & Adams, J. (2011). Acceptance of Online Degrees by Undergraduate Mexican Students. In T. Bastiaens & M. Ebner (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2011--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 238-246). Lisbon, Portugal: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 20, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Adams, J. (2008). Understanding the factors that limit the acceptability of online courses and degrees. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(4), 573-587.
  2. Adams, J. & DeFleur, M. (2005). The acceptability of a doctoral degree earned online as a credential for obtaining a faculty position. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 71-85.
  3. Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2009). Learning on Demand: Online Education in the United States, 2009. Retrieved on October 9, 2010, from http://www.sloan-C.org
  4. Ballesteros Garcia, L. (2005). Aceptaci ó n del estudio de maestrí as en línea por los alumnos de posgrado de la Facultad de Contadurí a y Administració n de la Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua [Acceptance of the study of online master degrees by postgraduate students of the Faculty of Accounting and Management of the Autonomous University of Chihuahua]. Unpublished Master ’ s thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico.
  5. Bartlett, T., & Smallwood, S. (2004, June 25). Let me be honest with you. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 50, A15.
  6. Bernard, R.M., Abrami, P.C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L. & Fiset, M. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379439.
  7. Blumenstyk, G. (2005, January 31). For-profit education companies brace themselves for‘ 60 Minutes’ expose. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51, A28.
  8. Carnevale, D. (2002, September 6). Colleges demand that fakedegrees.com remove their names from its website. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 49, A44.
  9. Carnevale, D., & Olsen, F. (2003, June 13). How to succeed in distance education. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(40), A31.
  10. Chaney, E.G. (2002). Pharmaceutical employers' perceptions of employees or applicants with e-degrees or online coursework. Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana State University, United States--Indiana. Retrieved on October 23, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global.(Publication No. AAT 3061561). Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT). (2008). Programa Especial de Ciencia y Tecnología 2008-2012 [Special Program of Science and Technology]. Diario Oficial, 56-123. Retrieved on December 1, 2010, from http://www.conacyt.gob.mx/Acerca/Documentos%20Normatividad/Programa-Especial-de-Ciencia-y-Tecnologia_2008-2012.pdf
  11. Delfino, M., Manca, S., Persico, D. & Sarti, L. (2004, February). Online learning: Attitudes, expectations and prejudices of adult novices. Proceedings of the IASTED (International Association of Science and Technology for Development) International Conference of Internet-Based Education, Innsbruck, Austria.
  12. Flowers, J.C. & Baltzer, H. (2006). Hiring Technical Education faculty: Vacancies, criteria, and attitudes toward online doctoral degrees. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 43(3), 29-44.
  13. Government Accounting Office. (2010) For-profit colleges: Undercover Testing Finds Colleges Encouraged Fraud and Engaged in Deceptive and Questionable Marketing Practices. Highlights of GAO-10-948T A testimony before the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, U.S. Senate. U.S. Government Accounting Office. Downloaded on October 1, 2010 from www.gao.gov
  14. Hahne, A.K., Benndorf, R., Frey, P. & Herzig, S. (2005). Attitude towards computer-based learning: Determinants as revealed by a controlled interventional study. Medical Education, 39, 935-943.
  15. Hebel, S. (2006, January 23). New York Regents place moratorium on approving new for-profit colleges or programs. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved on January 23, 2006 from http://chronicle.com/daily/2006/01/2006012304n.htm
  16. Ibrahim, D.Z., Silong, A.D. & Samah, B.A. (2002, February). Readiness and attitude towards online learning among virtual students. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of the Asian Association of Open Universities, New Delhi, India.
  17. Keller, C. & Cernerud, L. (2002). Students’ perceptions of e-learning in university education. Journal of Educational Media, 27(1-2), 55-67.
  18. Ortega Amieva, D.C. (2004). Estudio sobre el uso de las tecnolog í as de comunicación e informació n para la virtualización de la educación superior en México [Study on the use of information and communication technologies for the virtualization of higher education in Mexico]. Asociaci ó n Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior (ANUIES). Retrieved on December 10, 2010, from http://www.anuies.mx/e_proyectos/pdf/Univ_virtual.pdf
  19. Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What ’ s the Difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.
  20. Rockwell, S.K., Schauer, J., Fritz, S.M., & Marx, D.B. (1999). Incentives and obstacles influencing higher education faculty and administrators to teach. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 3(4). Retrieved on November 4, 2004, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/rockwell24.html
  21. Russell, T.(1999). The‘ no significant difference’ phenomenon. Retrieved on http://nt.media.hku.hk/no_sig_diff/phenom1.html
  22. Varsalona, D. (2005, July 25). Pennsylvania court shuts down website accused of selling fake degrees The Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(46), A24.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.