You are here:

Introducing In-Service Teachers to Virtual Schooling through the Lens of the Three Teacher Roles
PROCEEDINGS

, Wayne State University, United States

  • Full Text
  • Citation
  • Save to Collections
  • E-mail
  • Share
  • OpenURL

    • Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

    Abstract

    This study will examine the third and fourth rounds of data collection from an action research project designed to help in-service teachers become better virtual school facilitators (currently being analyzed). The data included blog entries and comments from five of the seven graduate students in an instructional technology course related to K-12 online learning. The specific discussion prompts relate to virtual school readings and the Teacher Education Goes into Virtual Schooling (TEGIVS) curriculum. Based upon initial analysis, the TEGIVS curriculum was effective for providing these graduate students some experience with how K-12 online learning opportunities were delivered, along with some of the possibilities and challenges associated with K-12 online learning. The analysis of this data is continuing, and there are plans to continue this line of inquiry with additional students in future offerings as we continue to improve upon the course design.

    Citation

    Barbour, M. (2011). Introducing In-Service Teachers to Virtual Schooling through the Lens of the Three Teacher Roles. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3425-3432). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved April 19, 2019 from .

    Keywords

    View References & Citations Map

    References

    1. Barbour, M.K., & Cooze, M. (2004). All for one and one for all: Designing web-based courses for students based upon individual learning styles. Staff and Educational Development International, 8(2/3), 95 – 108.
    2. Barbour, M.K., & Mulcahy, D. (2004). The role of mediating teachers in Newfoundland ’ s new model of distance education. The Morning Watch, 32(1). Retrieved from http://www.mun.ca/educ/faculty/mwatch/fall4/barbourmulcahy.htm
    3. Barbour, M.K., & Mulcahy, D. (2009). Beyond volunteerism and good will: Examining the commitment of schoolbased teachers to distance education. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (779-784). Norfolk, VA: AACE.
    4. Barbour, M.K., & Reeves, T.C. (2009). The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature. Computers and Education, 52(2), 402 – 416.
    5. Barbour, M.K., & Unger, K. (2009). Challenging teachers’ preconceptions, misconceptions, and concerns of virtual
    6. Clark, T. (2000). Virtual high schools: State of the states-A study of virtual high school planning and preparation in the United States. Center for the Application of Information Technologies, Western Illinois University. Retrieved from http://www.imsa.edu/programs/ivhs/pdfs/stateofstates.pdf
    7. Clark, T. (2001). Virtual schools: Trends and issues-A study of virtual schools in the United States. San Francisco, CA: Western Regional Educational Laboratories. Retrieved from http://www.wested.org/online_pubs/virtualschools.pdf
    8. Compton, L., Follett, J., & Demiraslan, Y. (2007). Challenging Preservice Teachers' Preconceptions, Misconceptions, and Concerns of Virtual Schooling: A Preliminary Analysis. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price,
    9. Cooze, M., & Barbour, M.K. (2007). Learning styles: A focus upon e-learning practices and pedagogy and their implications for successful instructional design. Journal of Applied Educational Technology, 4(1). Retrieved from http://www.eduquery.com/jaet/JAET4-1_Cooze.pdf
    10. Davis, N.E. (2007, November). Teacher education for virtual schools. A presentation at annual Virtual School Symposium, Louisville, KY. Retrieved from http://ctlt.iastate.edu/~tegivs/TEGIVS/publications/VS%20Symposium2007.pdf
    11. Davis, N., Demiraslan, Y., & Wortmann, K. (2007, October). Preparing to support online learning in K-12. A presentation at the Iowa Educational Technology conference, Des Moines, IA. Retrieved from http://ctlt.iastate.edu/~tegivs/TEGIVS/publications/ITEC2007-presentations.pdf
    12. Davis, N.E. & Roblyer, M.D. (2005). Preparing teachers for the "schools that technology built": Evaluation of a program to train teachers for virtual schooling. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(4),
    13. DiPietro, M., Ferdig, R.E., Black, E.W. & Preston, M. (2008). Best practices in teaching K-12 online: Lessons learned from Michigan Virtual School teachers. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(1). Retrieved from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/getfile.cfm?volID=7 & IssueID=22 & ArticleID=113
    14. Easton, S. (2003). Clarifying the instructor ’ s role in online distance learning. Communications Education, 52(2), 87105.
    15. Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. London: Routledge.
    16. Keeler, C. (2004). Assessment in online environment: Across-school description of secondary courses. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA. Retrieved from http://coe.nevada.edu/ckeeler/teachingportfolio/researchinterests.html #Assessment_in_Online_Environments:_A
    17. Keeler, C. (2006). Designing online Courses to meet diverse learning style preferences. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from http://coe.nevada.edu/ckeeler/teachingportfolio/researchinterests.html #Learning_Styles
    18. Rice, K., & Dawley, L. (2007). Going virtual! The status of professional development for K-12 online teachers. Boise, ID: Boise State University. Retrieved from http://edtech.boisestate.edu/goingvirtual/goingvirtual1.pdf
    19. Roblyer, M.D., & McKenzie, B. (2000). Distant but not out-of-touch: What makes an effective distance learning instructor? Learning and Leading With Technology, 27(6), 50-53.
    20. Ruona, W.E.A. (2005). Analyzing qualitative data. In R.A. Swanson& E.F. Holdton III (Eds.), Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry (pp. 233-263). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers,
    21. Watson, J.F., Gemin, B., & Ryan, J. (2008). Keeping pace with k–12 online learning: A review of statelevel policy and practice. Vienna, VA: North American Council for Online Learning. Retrieved from http://www.kpk12.com/downloads/KeepingPace_2008.pdf
    22. Watson, J.F. & Kalmon, S. (2005). Keeping pace with K–12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and

    These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

    View References & Citations Map

    Cited By

    1. Establishing Presence and Community in the Online Classroom

      Brianne Leigh Moore-Adams, Virginia Commonwealth University, United States; Sarah Warnick, Virtual Virginia, United States

      Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (Mar 21, 2016) pp. 844–849

    These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

    Also Read

    Related Collections