You are here:

Adolescents’ activities online and how their notions of learning shape strategies and expectation
PROCEEDINGS

, , Michigan State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This paper reports on a case study of adolescents’ experiences online. Specifically this study sought to explore adolescents’ typical Internet use and understand how adolescents’ notions of learning impacted their use of self-regulated learning strategies online. Interview data was collected from 13 adolescent participants and their parents and was coded using grounded theory analysis (Glaser and Strauss, 1967) and the constant comparative method. Analysis indicates that participants’ Internet use is highly dynamic and not easily categorized. Additionally, results suggested that adolescents’ notions and understanding of learning influenced their computer and Internet use. Participants reported differential computer use based on the specific task (academic or informal) and held differing expectations for possible and intended outcomes. Implications for findings are discussed as well as necessary next steps and future directions.

Citation

Kereluik, K. & Mishra, P. (2011). Adolescents’ activities online and how their notions of learning shape strategies and expectation. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 33-42). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved January 17, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Boekaerts, M. (2002). Interested in learning, learning to be interested. Learning and Instruction, 12, 375-382.
  2. Boekaerts, M., & Minnert, A. (1999).Self-regulation with respect to informal learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 533-544.
  3. Boekaerts, M., Maes, S., & Karoly, P. (2005). Self-Regulation across domains of applied psychology: Is there an emerging consensus? Applied Psychology, 54(2), 149-154.
  4. Cilesiz, S. (2009). Educational computer use in leisure contexts: A phenomenological study of adolescents’ experiences at Internet cafes. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 232-274.
  5. Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angles: Sage.
  6. Donoso, V. & Roe, K. (2006). Are They Really Learning Online? The Impact of the Internet on Chilean Adolescents’ Learning Experiences. In E. Pearson& P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2006 (pp. 1679-1686). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  7. Erstad, O. (2003). Electracy as empowerment: student activities in learning environments using technology. Nordic Journal of Youth Research, 11(1), 11-28.
  8. Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
  9. Laws, K., & McLeod, R. (2004). Case study and Grounded Theory: Sharing some alternative qualitative research methodologies with systems professionals. In M. Kennedy, G.W. Winch, R.S. Lager, J.I. Rowe& J.M. Yanni (Ed) Proceedings of 22nd International Conference of the Systems Dynamics Society pp. 78 link to paper). Oxford, (25-29 July).
  10. Lenhart, A., Hitlin, P., & Madden, M. (2005). Teens and technology. Pew Internet& American Life Project. Http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2005/Teens-and-Technology/01Summary-of-Findings.aspx?r=1.
  11. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  12. Pintrich, P.R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego,
  13. Rideout, V.J., Foehr, U.G., & Roberts, D.F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8-to 18-Year-Olds, Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 2010; www.kff.org/entmedia/upload8010.pdf.
  14. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.