You are here:

Networked Participatory Scholarship: Socio-cultural & Techno-cultural Pressures on Scholarly Practice PROCEEDINGS

, , University of Texas at Austin, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Orlando, Florida, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-83-9 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

We discuss networked participatory scholarship by investigating technological and cultural stimuli for transforming education scholarship. We note that participation in online spaces is important for research, teaching, and professional development, and argue that absence from such spaces is detrimental to practice/research. We present these issues by discussing the trends and problems that are exerting pressure on scholarship to change, and conclude this paper by highlighting a few of the complexities introduced by networked participatory scholarship.

Citation

Veletsianos, G. & Kimmons, R. (2010). Networked Participatory Scholarship: Socio-cultural & Techno-cultural Pressures on Scholarly Practice. In J. Sanchez & K. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2010--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2260-2267). Orlando, Florida, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 16, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Andersen, D.L. (2003). Digital Scholarship in the Tenure, Promotion, and Review Process. M.E. Sharpe.
  2. Ayers, E.L. (2004, January 30). Doing Scholarship on the Web: 10 Years of Triumphs and a Disappointment. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved July 30, 2010, from http://chronicle.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/article/Doing-Scholarship-on-the-We/18713/
  3. Binkley, R.C. (1935). New Tools for Men of Letters. The Yale Review, 24. Retrieved from http://www.wallandbinkley.com/rcb/articles/newtools-output.html
  4. Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities for the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  5. Briggle, A., & Mitcham, C. (2009). Embedding and networking: conceptualizing experience in a technosociety.
  6. Carr, N. (2010). The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. W.W. Norton& Company.
  7. Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic Education: Community as Curriculum. Retrieved July 30, 2010, from http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol4_issue5/Rhizomatic_Education-__Community_as_Curriculum.pdf
  8. Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2009). How the Crowd Can Teach. In S. Hatzipanagos& S. Warburton (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Social Software and Developing Ontologies (pp. 1-17). London: IGI Global.
  9. Fountain, J.E. (2001). Building the virtual state: information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press.
  10. Greenhow, C. (2009). Social scholarship: Applying social networking technologies to research practices. Knowledge Quest, 37(4), 42-47.
  11. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 233– 245.
  12. Hajjem, C., Harnad, S. And Gingras, Y. (2005) Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 28 (4), 39-47.
  13. Hughes, J., Thomas, R., & Scharber, C. (2006). Assessing Technology Integration: The RAT-Replacement, Amplification, and Transformation-Framework. Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 3, 1616.
  14. Jenkins, J., & English, F.W. (2006). Constructivism. Encyclopedia of Educational Leadership and Administration (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Reference. Retrieved July 28, 2010, from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/I.do?id=GALE|CX3469600133 & V=2.1 & U=txshracd2598 & It=r & P=GVRL & Sw
  15. Jonassen, D. (2000). Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
  16. Kiernan, V. (2000, April 28). Rewards Remain Dim for Professors Who Pursue Digital Scholarship. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved August 20, 2010, from http://chronicle.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/article/Rewards-Remain-Dim-for-Prof/6441/
  17. King, J.L., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K.L., McFarlan, F.W., Raman, K.S., & Yap, C.S. (1994). Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research, 5(2), 139 – 169.
  18. Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008, October). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? Retrieved
  19. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Leu, D.J., O'Byrne, W.I., Zawilinski, L., McVerry, J.G., and Everett-Cacopardo, H. (2009). Comments on Greenhow, Robelia, and Hughes: Expanding the new literacies conversation. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 264-269.
  21. Lowenthal, P.R., Muth, R., & Provenzo, E.F. (2009). Constructivism. Encyclopedia of the Social and Cultural Foundations of Education (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc. Retrieved July 30, 2010, from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/I.do?id=GALE|CX3074500097 & V=2.1 & U=txshracd2598 & It=r & P=GVRL & Sw
  22. Noble, D. (2002). Digital Diploma Mills: The Automation of Higher Education. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
  23. Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization science, 398 – 427.
  24. Pellino, G., Blackburn, R., & Boberg, A. (1984). The dimensions of academic scholarship: Faculty and administrator views. Research in Higher Education, 20, 103-115.
  25. Prawat, R.S., Salkind, N.J., & Rasmussen, K. (2008). Constructivism. Encyclopedia of Educational Psychology (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
  26. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.
  27. Siemens, G. (2005, January). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Retrieved January 30, 2010, from http://www.itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm
  28. Siemens, G., & Matheos, K. (2010). Systemic Changes in Higher Education. Retrieved July 30, 2010, from http://ineducation.ca/article/systemic-changes-higher-education
  29. Shirky, C. (2008). Gin, television, and cognitive surplus: a talk by Clay Shirky. In The Edge.
  30. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. London: Harvard University Press.
  31. Wilson, B.G., Parrish, P., & Veletsianos, G. (2008). Raising the bar for instructional outcomes: Toward transformative learning experiences. Volume XLVIII Number 3 May– June 2008, 39.
  32. Zawacki-Richter, O., Anderson, T., & Tuncay, N. (2010). The Growing Impact of Open Access Distance Education Journals: A Bibliometric Analysis. The Journal Of Distance Education/ Revue De L'É Ducation à Distance, 24(3). Retrieved August 8, 2010, from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/661

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.