Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 20, Number 1, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA
Improving teacher quality is arguably the most effective way to improve student achievement. Online professional development (OPD) has great potential to improve teacher quality. There is a dearth of scientific research, however, on whether changes in teachers’ knowledge and instructional practices resulting from OPD are linked to changes in students’ knowledge and practices. This paper presents the results of a randomized controlled trial exploring the effects of a learning-community model of OPD for teachers on the knowledge and practices of their students in the context of fourth grade English language arts. There were significant treatment effects for some student outcomes; the effect sizes, however, were small.
Masters, J., Magidin de Kramer, R., O’Dwyer, L., Dash, S. & Russell, M. (2012). The Effects of Online Teacher Professional Development on Fourth Grade Students’ Knowledge and Practices in English Language Arts. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 21-46. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 26, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/35346/.
© 2012 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education
- Banilower, E.R., & Shimkus, E.S. (2004). LSC professional development study: An analysis of data collected between 1997 and 2003. Chapel hill, N.C.: horizon research, inc.
- Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction. Ny: guilford Press.
- Cochran-smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2001) Beyond certainty: taking an inquiry stance on Practice. In. A. Lieberman & L. Miller (eds.), Teachers caught in
- Cohen J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, nJ: erlbaum.
- Corcoran, T. B. (2007). Teaching matters: How state and local policymakers can improve the quality of teachers and teaching. (cPre Policy Briefs rB-48). Philadelphia, Pa: consortium for Policy research in education, university of Pennsylvania.
- Darling-hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1).
- Dede, C. (2006). (ed.). Online Professional Development for Teachers. Cambridge, Ma: harvard education Press.
- Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199.
- Elmore, R. F. (2002). Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: The imperative for professional development in education. Washington, dc: albert shanker institute.
- Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, ca: corwin Press.
- Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes Pd effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748-750.
- Hawley, W., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: a new consensus. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-hammond (eds.), Teaching
- Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes & Efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10).
- Johnson, C., Kahle, J., & Fargo, J. (2007). A study of the effect of sustained, whole-school professional development on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 775–786.
- Keller, B. (2005). Teachers flocking to online sources to advance and acquire knowledge. Education Week, 24, 22–24.
- Keppel, G. & Wickens, T.D. (2004). Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s Handbook (4th ed.). Prentice hall.
- Ketelhut, D. J., Mccloskey, E. M., dede, C., Breit, L. A., & Whitehouse, P. L. (2006). Core tensions in the evolution of Online Professional development. In C. Dede (ed.), Online Professional Development for Teachers (pp. 237-263). Cambridge, Ma: harvard education Press.
- Klein, A. (2010, March 10). Esea renewal: what we Know so Far [web log message]. Retrieved January, 2010 from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k-12/2010/03/differentitated_consequences_c.html
- Kleiman, G.M. (2004). Meeting the need for high quality teachers: e-Learning solutions [white Paper]. Retrieved January, 2010 from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/plan/2004/site/documents/Kleiman-Meet - ingtheneed.pdf.
- Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237–257.
- Peha, S. (2002a). What is good writing? retrieved on March 10, 2010 from: http://ttms.Org/PdFs/13%20what%20is%20good%20writing%20v001%20(Full).pdf
- Peha, S. (2002b). The writing Process notebook. Retrieved on March 10, 2010 from:
- Raphael, T. (1986). Teaching question answer relationships, revisited. The Reading Teacher (39) 6, 516-522.
- Rice, J. K. (2003). Teacher Quality: Understanding the Effectiveness of Teacher Attributes. Washington, dc: economic Policy institute.
- Texas reading initiative. (2000). Comprehension Instruction. Austin, tX: Publications distribution office. Ed453517.
- Treacy, B., Kleiman, G., & Peterson, K. (2002). Successful online professional development. Learning and Leading with Technology 30(1), 42-47.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Ali Suwayied Alqarni, Southern Illinois University (SIUC), United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2015 (Oct 19, 2015) pp. 1384–1390
Tonya Hameister, Marian University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 3190–3194
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.