You are here:

Enthusiasm or Skepticism? What Students Think about E-Learning PROCEEDINGS

, , TU Wien, Inst.f.Gestaltungs- u.Wirkungsforschung, Austria

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Toronto, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-81-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC


It is essential for the efficient implementation of e-learning that students have positive attitudes about this new approach. Existing literature indicates that students’ attitudes about e-learning are mixed. To support the implementation of the e-learning platform TUWEL at Vienna University of Technology, we conducted a study using semi-structured questionnaires with open-ended questions. Students enjoy the flexibility e-learning offers, but some of them do not want to miss the personal contacts to other students traditional lectures offer. Students are also skeptical about electronic learning material. This might be due to the lack of quality of these materials which was also mentioned in the present study. Informal learning, supported electronically, seems to form an important part of students’ learning activities and should be investigated in more detail.


Pohl, M. & Wieser, D. (2010). Enthusiasm or Skepticism? What Students Think about E-Learning. In J. Herrington & C. Montgomerie (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2010--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 3921-3928). Toronto, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 13, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Baker, M., Boggs, R., Arabasz, P. (2003). Student and faculty perspectives on e-learning support. Educause Research Bulletin 3(16).
  2. Clark, R., Mayer, R. (2003). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction. San Francisco: John Wiley.
  3. Collis, B., Moonen, J. (2002). Flexible Learning in a Digital World. London: Kogan Page.
  4. Hara, N., Kling, R. (2000). Students’ distress with a web-based distance education course. Information& Communication& Society, 3(4), 557-579
  5. Keller, C., Cernerud, L. (2002). Students’ Perception of E-Learning in University Education. Journal of Educational Media, Vol. 27, Nos. 1-2 (2002), 55-67.
  6. Livingstone, D.W. (2001). Adults' Informal Learning: Definitions, Findings, Gaps and Future Research. NALL Working Paper No.21, 2001, Centre for the Study of Education and Work, University of Toronto.
  7. Minshull, G., Mole, J., (eds.) (2006). JISC –
  8. Pohl, M., Herbst, I., Reichl, F., Wiltner, S. (2007). University Students' Attitudes about E-Learning. In: Constantine Stephanidis (ed.) "Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services", Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer LNCS, 738-747.(cid:1)
  9. Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G., Francis, R. (2006). The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice. Technical report, The Higher Education Academy (October 2006), (last seen 31.12.2006).
  10. Tait, K. (1998). Replacing lectures with multimedia CBL: Student attitudes and reactions. Instructional Science 26 409 – 438.
  11. Wieser, D. (2008). Einstellung der Studenten bezü glich E-Learning und Informellen Lernens. Diploma Thesis, Vienna.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact