You are here:

Building Computer-based Tutors to Help Learners Solve Ill-Structured Problems PROCEEDINGS

, , Seneca College, Canada

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Toronto, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-81-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC


This paper reports the results of a study on the effectiveness of three distinct instructional strategies, embedded in a computer-based tutor, in order to help learners solve ill-structured problems. The study differentiated learners on three levels with respect to their proficiency in solving visual pattern-recognition problems, such as Bongard problems. For the purpose of the study, a computer-based tutor system was designed and built to operate with three strategies: (i) example only, (ii) example-problem, and (iii) problem only. This formative research demonstrated that the basic assumptions of the Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) are equally applicable to ill-structured domains. The paper shows that the worked-example effect and the expertise-reversal effect are obtainable in an ill-structured domain. For intermediate learners, worked-examples and tutored problems are not redundant tools, but rather, synergistic forms of support that can increase these learners' abilities to solve ill-structured problems.


Anastasiade, J. & Szalwinski, C. (2010). Building Computer-based Tutors to Help Learners Solve Ill-Structured Problems. In J. Herrington & C. Montgomerie (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2010--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 3726-3731). Toronto, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 19, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Anderson, J.R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
  2. Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A., Koedinger, K., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167-207.
  3. Blessing, S., & Anderson, J.R. (1996). How people learn to skip steps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, 598. Memory, and Congntion 22, 576 –
  4. Bloom, B.S. (1984). The 2-sigma problem: the search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring, Educational Researcher, 13, pp. 4-16.
  5. Bongard, M.M. (1970). Pattern Recognition. Rochelle Park, N.J.: Spartan Books.
  6. Corbett, A.T. (2001). Cognitive Computer Tutors: Solving the Two-Sigma Problem. In Proceedings of the 8th international Conference on User Modeling 2001 (July 13-17, 2001). M. Bauer, P.J. Gmytrasiewicz, and J. Vassileva, Eds. Lecture Notes In Computer Science, vol. 2109. Springer-Verlag, London, 137-147.
  7. Foundalis, H.E. (2006). Phaeaco: A Cognitive Architecture Inspired by Bongard’s Problems. Dissertation Thesis, Computer Science and Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN. Retrieved November 12, 2007 from
  8. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23-31.
  9. Koedinger, K., & Aleven, V. (2007, September). Exploring the Assistance Dilemma in Experiments with Cognitive Tutors. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 239-264. Retrieved July 16, 2008, doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9049-0
  10. Newell, A. (1990). Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  11. Rourke, A., & Sweller, J. (2009). The worked-example effect using ill-defined problems: Learning to recognize designers' styles. Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 185-199.
  12. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J.J.G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 251-296.
  13. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Acknowledgements

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact