You are here:

An Examination of Technology-Mediated Feminist Consciousness-raising in Art Education PROCEEDINGS

, SUNY-Empire State College, Center for Distance Learning, United States

AACE Award

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in San Diego, CA, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-78-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


As female enrollment in higher education continues to grow and information and visual technologies continue to advance, art educators need to carefully examine and implement pedagogy in technology-mediated learning environments in order to generate innovative ways to empower female students. To this end, I conducted an empirical study to explore the pedagogical rationale and strategies that would support raising gender consciousness through a technology-mediated learning environment. Using a feminist lens, I first examine gender issues in technological social and learning environments. I suggest that art educators carefully practice feminist pedagogy and feminist consciousness-raising (CR) in order to motivate students to examine gender issues in art. I then present a sampling of student online discussions to illustrate how the Interaction Analysis Model can be applied to foster a feminist CR space that privileges participation, dialogue, diverse personal narratives, multiple interpretations, experiential knowledge, and gender-centeredness.


Lai, A. (2010). An Examination of Technology-Mediated Feminist Consciousness-raising in Art Education. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3013-3020). San Diego, CA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 15, 2018 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Anderson, D.M., & Haddad, C.J. (2005). Gender, voice and learning in online course environments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(1), 3-14.
  2. Anderson, T., & Kuskis, A. (2007). Modes of interaction. In M.G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed.) (pp. 295-309). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  3. Buffington, M. (2008). What is Web 2.0 and how can it further art education? Art Education, 61(3), 36-41.
  4. Crenshaw, K.W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241 – 1299.
  5. Delacruz, E. (2004). Teachers’ working conditions and the unmet promise of technology. Studies in Art Education, 46(1), 6-19.
  6. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
  7. Gunawardena, C.N., Lowe, C.A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal
  8. Gunn, C., McSporran, M., MacLeod, H., & French, S. (2003). Dominant or different? Gender issues in computer supported learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 14-30.
  9. Hoffmann, F.L., & Stake, J.E. (1998). Feminist pedagogy in theory and practice: An empirical investigation. Journal of the National Women's Studies Association, 10(1), 79-97.
  10. Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1998). Online social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 57-74.
  11. Keifer-Boyd, K. (2003). A pedagogy to expose and critique gendered cultural stereotypes embedded in art interpretations. Studies in Art Education, 44(4), 315-334.
  12. Keifer-Boyd, K., & Smith-Shank, D.L. (2006). Speculative fiction's contribution to contemporary understanding: The handmaid art tale. Studies in Art Education, 47(2), 139-154.
  13. King, A. (2002). Structuring peer interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing. Theory into Practice, 41(1), 33-39.
  14. Kirkup, G. (2005). Developing practice for online feminist pedagogy. In R. Braidotti, & A. Van Baren (Eds.), The making of European women's studies (Vol. VI) (pp. 26-40). Utrecht: Athena.
  15. Kramarae, C. (2007). Gender matters in online learning. In M.G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed.) (pp. 169-180). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  16. Lai, A. (2002). From classrooms to chatrooms: Virtualizing art education. Art Education, 55(4), P. 33-39.
  17. Lai, A., & Ball, E.L. (2004). Students online as cultured subjects: Prolegomena to researching multicultural arts courses on the web. Studies in Art Education, 46(1), 20-33.
  18. Lai, A., & Lu, L. (2009). Integrating feminist pedagogy with online teaching: Facilitating critiques of patriarchal visual culture. Visual Culture& Gender, 4, 58-68.
  19. Lather. P. (2006). The absent presence: Patriarchy, capitalism, and the nature of teacher work. In E.F. Jr. Provenzo (Ed.), Critical issues in education: An anthology of readings (pp. 154-167). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  20. Liao, C.L. (2008). My metamorphic avatar journey. Visual Cultural& Gender, 3, 30-39.
  21. Lokken, F., Womer, L., & Mullins, C. (2009). 2008 Distance education survey results: Tracking the impact of e DASHDASH
  22. Lu, L. (2008). Art Café: A 3D virtual learning environment for art education. Art Education, 61(6), 48-53.
  23. Miller, P.H. (2005). Gender and information technology: Perspectives from human cognitive development. Frontiers, 26(1), 148-167.
  24. Moore, J.L., & Marra, R.M. (2005). A comparative analysis of online discussion participation protocols. Journal of
  25. Palloff, R.M., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating online: Learning together in community. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
  26. Pitts, V. (2005). Feminism, technology and body projects. Women's Studies, 34(3), 229-247.
  27. Snyder, R.C. (2008). What is third-wave feminism? A new directions essay. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 34(1), 175-196.
  28. Tavin, K. (2003). Wrestling with angels, searching for ghosts: Toward a critical pedagogy of visual culture. Studies in Art Education, 44(3), 197-213.
  29. Torrens, K.M. (2007). Disrupting transmission: Online learning in gender communication. Transformations, 18(1), 52-62.
  30. Turpin, C.A. (2007). Feminist praxis, online teaching, and the urban campus. Feminist Teacher. 18(1), 9-27.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact