You are here:

First Year University Students’ Access, Usage and Expectations of Technology: An Australian Pilot Study
PROCEEDINGS

, , Southern Cross University, Australia

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Vancouver, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-76-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

Abstract: In recent years, reports in the popular press have highlighted the rapid take-up of Web 2.0 type tools that support social networking, collaboration and information access. Also, there have been calls for universities to be more innovative in their use of these emerging technologies for learning and not just for the distribution of resources and the management of grades. Unfortunately, there is little empirical evidence documenting the technology-related uses, experience, expectations, skill levels and training needs of the board range of students that are currently entering Australian Universities. This paper reports on a pilot survey of a sample of first year students entering a regional Australian University. Contrary to expectations, this research indicates that the youngest students had the lowest desire to use the technologies in their studies. These findings have implications for program development and delivery particular at first year level.

Citation

Ellis, A. & Newton, D. (2009). First Year University Students’ Access, Usage and Expectations of Technology: An Australian Pilot Study. In T. Bastiaens, J. Dron & C. Xin (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2009--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2539-2546). Vancouver, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved April 11, 2021 from .

© 2009 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning was important, in D. Boud and N. Falchikov (eds) Rethinking assessment in higher education. Routledge, London, pp.14-15.
  2. Boud, D. & Falchikov, N. (2007). Assessment in the longer term, in D.Boud and N. Falchikov (eds) Rethinking assessment in higher education. Routledge, London, pp.4-13.
  3. Conole, G., de Laat, M., Dillon, T. & Darby, J. (2006). LXP: Student experience of technologies. Final report. JISC, UK. [Accessed 5/4/09] http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/publications/lxpfinalreport.aspx Joint Information Systems Committee (2008). Great expectations of ICT: How Higher Education institutions are measuring up. [Accessed online 30/3/09] http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/publications/greatexpectations.aspx
  4. Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Mason, K., Bishop, A., Chang, R., & Chuchwood, A. (2007). The net-generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings from a large cross-institutional study. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007.
  5. Kennedy, G., Krause, K., Gray, K., Judd, T., Bennett, S., Maton, K., Dalgarno, B. & Bishop, A. (2006). Questioning the Net Generation: A collaborative project in Australian higher education. In Who’s learning? Whose technology? Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2006.
  6. O’Reilly, T. (2004). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. [Accessed online 5/4/09] http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005.09/30.what-is-th-Web-20.html
  7. Swain, H. (2000) University Challenge: Dawn of the cyberstudent. UK Gardian, [Accessed 5/4/09]. Http://www.guardian.co.uk/universitychallenge/cyberstudent Trinder, K., Guiller, J., Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Nicol, D. (2008). Learning from digital natives: Integrating formal and informal learning. The Higher Education Academy, UK. [Accessed 5/4/09] http://www.academy.gcal.ac.uk/ldn/LDNFinalReport.pdf

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read