You are here:

Real-time Video Services for Continuing Professional Development of the Greek Academic Network’s Technical Staff PROCEEDINGS

, , National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Vancouver, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-76-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


This study focused on evaluation of real-time video services for the continuing professional development of the Greek Academic Network’s technical staff. More specifically, two different real-time video services were compared – the videoconferencing and the live video broadcasting. A questionnaire was used to investigate the participants’ perceptions towards the six different dimensions, namely the instructional activities, instructor’s role, interaction, technology, visualization, and satisfaction. The findings of this study indicated that the videoconferencing was deemed more suitable to interactive teaching strategies such us be questioning, dialogue and discussions with the instructor and with their fellow classmates. On the other hand, well-organized lectures and the use of a variety of audiovisual material were critical to succeeding in the live video broadcasting lectures. The findings of this study also established some potential implications for the use of real-time video services in the distance learning environments.


Mouzakis, C. & Balaouras, P. (2009). Real-time Video Services for Continuing Professional Development of the Greek Academic Network’s Technical Staff. In T. Bastiaens, J. Dron & C. Xin (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2009--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1836-1841). Vancouver, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 22, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Annetta, L.A., & Matus, J.C. (2004). Analysis of satisfaction and perceived learning of science in different distance education delivery modes for rural elementary school teachers involved in a professional development project. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(3), 283-309.
  2. Bozkaya, M. (2008). The Relationship between Teacher Immediacy Behaviours and Distant Learners' Social Presence Perceptions in Videoconferencing Applications. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 1(9), 180-192.
  3. Fritze, Y., & Nordkvelle, Y.T. (2003). Comparing lectures: Effects of the technological context of the studio. Education and Information Technologies, 8(4), 327–343.
  4. Groen, J., Tworek, J., & Soos-Gonczol, M. (2008). The Effective Use of Synchronous Classes within an Online Graduate Program: Building upon an Interdependent System. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(2), 245-263
  5. Hilgenberg, C. & Tolone, W. (2000). Student perceptions of satisfaction and opportunities for critical thinking in distance education by interactive video. The American Journal of Distance Education, 14 (3), pp.59-78.
  6. Hron, A., Cress, U., Hammer, K., & Friedrich, H. (2007). Fostering Collaborative Knowledge Construction in a Video-Based Learning Setting: Effects of a Shared Workspace and a Content-Specific Graphical Representation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 236-248.
  7. Kubasko, D., Jones, M., Tretter, T. & Andre (2008). Is It Live or Is It Memorex? Students' Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication with Scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 30(4), 495-514.
  8. Mouzakis, C. & Balaouras P. (2007). On The Development of an Instrument for Pedagogic Evaluation of Videoconferencing Teaching Environments in Greek Higher Education. Open Education, 5, 19-35.
  9. Palmer, S. (2007). An Evaluation of Streaming Digital Video Resources in On-and Off-Campus Engineering Management Education. Computers& Education, 49(2), 297-308.
  10. Reisslein, J., Seeling, P., & Reisslein, M. (2005). Video in distance education: ITFS vs. Web-streaming: Evaluation of student attitudes. Internet and Higher Education, 8, 25–44.
  11. Reynolds, P. & Mason, R. (2002). On-line media for continuing professional development in dentistry. Computers& Education, 39, 65-98.
  12. Trotter, A. (2008). Voluntary Online-Teaching Standards Come Amid Concerns over Quality. Education Week, 26(27), 1-15.
  13. Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Mavrotheris, E., and Paparistodemou, E. (2009). SMASH: Online Training in Mathematics and Science Education for Parents. Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Education (ICICTE-2009), Corfu, Greece.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact