You are here:

CSI: Creating student (and teacher) investigators: Using popular culture in professional development.
ARTICLE

, Akansas State University, United States ; , , , Arkansas State University, United States

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 18, Number 2, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Abstract The goal of this article is to present a description of a professional development program designed to immerse middle and high school teachers in an inquiry-based learning environment using a forensic science context and the consequent impact participating in this program had on teachers’ pedagogy. Teachers participated in a year-long program consisting of two summer institutes and one programming during the academic year. Teachers spent the first week of each summer institute exploring various science domains using a forensic science context. Week 2 was spent with approximately 100 seventh – twelfth grade students, pedagogy, and teachers taught these students the material they had learned in the prior week, with the support of grant personnel. Academic year activities included two on-campus follow-up meetings. Results revealed teachers were enthusiastic about reform-based pedagogy learned in the institute. Furthermore, many teachers implemented forensic science activities with their own classes during the academic year, using principles covered in the institute. Teachers believed the institute supported their pedagogical changes and acted as change-agents in their schools.

Citation

Yanowitz, K.L., McKay, T., Ross, C.A. & Vanderpool, S.S. (2010). CSI: Creating student (and teacher) investigators: Using popular culture in professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(2), 265-286. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved September 25, 2022 from .

© 2010 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. American association for the advancement of science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, oxford University press.
  2. Ball, D.L., & Cohen, D.K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (eds.), Teaching as the learning professions. (pp. 3 – 31). San Francisco, ca: jossey-Bass.
  3. Bonneau, J. (2005). Forensics: Connecting science investigations with TI data collection activities (pp. 106 – 113). Dallas, tX: texan instruments, inc. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teaching learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3 – 15.
  4. Bybee, R.W. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E.H. Van zee (eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 20 – 46). Washington dc: american association for the advancement of science.
  5. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597 -604.
  6. Davis, K.S. (2002). “change is hard”: what science teachers are telling us about reform and
  7. Fishman, B.J., Marx, R.W., Best, S., & Tal, R. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systematic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 643 – 658.
  8. Kennedy, M.M. (1999). Form and substance in mathematics and science professional development. National Institute for Science Education Brief, 3(2), 1 – 9. Keys, C.W., & Bryan, L.A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-base science with teachers: essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 631 – 645.
  9. Klingner, J.K. (2004). The science of professional development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 248 – 255.
  10. Moscovici, H., & Nelson, T.M. (1998). Shifting from activitymania to inquiry. Science and Children, 35, 14 – 17.
  11. National assessment Governing Board (2005). Science framework for the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, dc., Us department of education.
  12. National center for education statistics (2005). Characteristics of public school teachers’ professional development activities 1999-2000. Washington, dc, institute of education sciences, nces 2005 – 030.
  13. National research council (2001). National science education standards. Washington, dc: national academy press.
  14. Nsta express (2004, october). NSTA survey reveals forensic science is the hottest new trend in teaching science. Nsta express. Retrieved February 13, 2006 from http://science.nsta.org/nstaexpress/nstaexpress_2004_10_25_forensic.htm
  15. Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29 (1), 4 – 15.
  16. Roehrig, G.H., & Kruse, R.A. (2005). The role of teachers’ beliefs and knowledge in the adoption of a reform-based curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 8, 412 – 422.
  17. Schlumberger excellence in educational development (2009). Laboratory - Build A Doppler Buzzer Ball Instructions. Retrieved august 28, 2009 from http://www.seed.slb.com/labcontent.aspx?id=11064.
  18. Swango, C.J. & Steward, S.B. (2003). Help! I’m teaching middle school science. Arlington, Va: nsta press.
  19. Wheeler, G. (2006). Ten years of science education standards and the roadmap to success. School Science and Mathematics, 106, 169 – 172.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections