Login or register for free to remove ads.
You are here:

The Arctic Climate Modeling Program: Professional Development for Rural Teachers ARTICLE

, University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, United States

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 18, Number 2, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA


The Arctic Climate Modeling Program (ACMP) offered yearlong science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) professional development to teachers in rural Alaska. Teacher training focused on introducing youth to workforce technologies used in Arctic research.
Due to challenges in making professional development accessible to rural teachers, ACMP modified the traditional ITEST format, instead offering unique “curriculum resource-based professional development” that provided a year-round mix of training options for 165 teachers.
Sustainable program resources were created in collaboration with scientists from five research centers to mimic the processes and instruments used to study Arctic climate. Teachers were involved in the iterative design process because research indicates that teacher input into curriculum development builds teacher enthusiasm, pedagogical content knowledge, and a sense of ownership of the end product.
This study explores the question: Did the ACMP professional development framework provide teachers in rural Alaska schools with the tools and knowledge they needed to improve STEM instruction? A grounded theory approach was used to analyze teacher qualitative feedback. Teacher comments were coded and patterns analyzed in three databases. This analysis, along with student field-test data, provides evidence that the ACMP model is a feasible alternative to the ITEST model for offering teacher STEM professional development in rural areas. Teacher feedback indicates that ACMP was particularly successful in increasing student engagement in the scientific process and enhancing student technology skills.


Berry Bertram, K. (2010). The Arctic Climate Modeling Program: Professional Development for Rural Teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(2), 231-264. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved September 20, 2017 from .



  1. Anderman, L. H., Patrick, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2004). Creating adaptive motivational environments in the middle grades. Middle School Journal, 35(5), 33-39.
  2. Assembly of alaska native educators. (1999, February 2). Guidelines for preparing culturally responsive teachers for Alaska’s schools. Fairbanks: alaska native Knowledge network, University of alaska Fairbanks. Retrieved from http://www.ankn.uaf.edu/publications/
  3. Barnhardt, R. & Kawagley, A.O. (1999). A long journey: Alaska onward to excellence in Yupiit/Tuluksak schools: Case study. Portland, Or: northwest regional educational Lab.
  4. Boyer, P. (2006). Building community: Reforming math and science education in rural schools. Fairbanks: alaska native Knowledge network, Center for Cross-Cultural Studies, University of alaska Fairbanks.
  5. Brigham, F. J. (1991). Generating excitement: teacher enthusiasm and students with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council for Learning Disabilities, minneapolis, mn, October 10-12, 1991. Coenders, F., terlouw, C., & Dijkstra, S. (2008). Assessing teachers’ beliefs to facilitate the transition to a new chemistry curriculum: What do the teachers want? Journal of Science Teacher Education. 19(4), 317-335.
  6. Cruikshank, J. (2005). Do glaciers listen? Local knowledge, colonial encounters, and social imagination. Seattle, Wa: University of Washington Press.
  7. Falk, J. & Drayton, B. (1997). Dynamics of the relationships between science teachers and scientists in an innovative mentorship collaboration. Cambridge, ma: terC
  8. Gess-newsome, J., Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., & Woodbury, S. (2003). Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction: the anatomy of change in college science teaching. American Educational Research Journal. 40(3), 731-767.
  9. Hill, F., Kawagley, A.O., and Barnhardt, R. (2004). Alaska rural systemic initiative: Annual report, phase II, year four, 2003-2004. Funded by the national
  10. Science Foundation. Retrieved 2005 from http://www.akn.uaf.edu/arsi.html Hollon, R.E., Olson, D., eierman, R., havholm, K., & Hendrickson, J. E. (2002). Time to learn: a successful staff development model in K-12 science education. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. (erIC Document reproduction Service no. ED 465 602) retrieved november 9, 2009, from
  11. Huntoon, J.E., & Lane, M. (2005). Improving education and diversity in the geosciences – the need for innovative courses and curricula. Abstract from Geological Society of America Annual Meeting & Exposition. (Salt Lake City. October 16-19, 2005). Retrieved august 28, 2009, from
  12. Kawagley, A.O. (1995). A Yupiaq worldview: A pathway to ecology and spirit. Prospect heights, IL: Waveland Press.
  13. McDiarmid, G. W., Larson, E., & Hill, A. (2002). Retaining quality teachers for alaska. Executive Summary. Anchorage, aK: University of alaska anchorage.
  14. Meichtry, Y., & Smith, J. (2007). The impact of place-based professional development programs on teachers’ confidence, attitudes, and classroom practices. Journal of Environmental Education, 28(2), 15-32.
  15. National Center for education Statistics (nCeS). (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Committee on Prospering in the Global economy of the 21st Century: an agenda for american Science and technology, national academy of
  16. National Oceanic and atmospheric administration (nOaa). (2007). Climate literacy: Essential principles and fundamental concepts. [unpublished manuscript] retrieved October 2, 2008, from www.climate.noaa.gov/education/Climate_Literacy_Framework_Draft_v1.pdf
  17. National research Council. (2004). A vision for the International Polar Year 2007-2008. Washington, D.C.: the national academies Press.
  18. National research Council. (2007). Earth science applications from space: National imperatives for the next decade and beyond. Washington, DC: national academies Press.
  19. National Science Foundation (nSF). (2004). Graduate students and postdoctorates in science and engineering: Fall 2004. Retrieved august 28, 2009, from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf06325/tables.htm
  20. National Science Foundation (nSF). (2007). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. In Survey of Earned Doctorates, 1998–2005. National Science Foundation Division of Science resources Statistics. Retrieved January 2, 2009, from
  21. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21). (2004). Learning skills for information, communication, and media literacy: Science. Tucson, aZ: Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Retrieved august 28, 2009, from
  22. Pertzborn, R., & Limaye, S. (2000). Using earth and weather satellite data in the classroom. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2000 Proceedings, IGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000 International, 2, 573-575.
  23. Semken, S., & Morgan, F. (1997). Navajo pedagogy and earth systems. Journal of Geoscience Education, 45, 109-112.
  24. Stephens, S. (2001). Handbook for culturally responsive science curriculum. Fairbanks, aK: alaska Science Consortium and alaska rural Systemic Initiative.
  25. Suderman, A. (2008, april 11). Native students shadow teachers. Retrieved march 9, 2009, from
  26. White, P. A. (1992). Teacher empowerment under “ideal” school-site autonomy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 69-82.
  27. Wilson, P. (1997). Key factors in the performance and achievement of minority students at the University of alaska-Fairbanks. American Indian Quarterly, 21(3), 535-44.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.