You are here:

An Exploratory Approach to Understanding the Purposes of Computer and Internet Use in Web 2.0 Trends PROCEEDINGS

, Teachers College, Columbia University, United States ; , College of Management Commerce and Social Welfare, Gwangju University, Korea (South)

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Honolulu, HI, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-73-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

This paper is to develop and examine an inventory on the purposes of computers and internet use in the era of Web 2.0. Based on previous research and feedbacks from experts, an inventory was built to explore the factorability. 268 high school students in Korea participated in the study. Results showed that six factors including new ways of computer usage. Implications are discussed for future studies.

Citation

Lim, K. & Park, S.Y. (2009). An Exploratory Approach to Understanding the Purposes of Computer and Internet Use in Web 2.0 Trends. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2009--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 4332-4337). Honolulu, HI, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 16, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Barron, A.E., Kemker, K., Harmes, C., & Kalaydjian, K. (2003). Large-scale research study on technology in K-12 schools: technology integration as it relates to the national technology standards. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(4), 489-507.
  2. Baylor, A.L. & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers and Education, 39(4), 395-414.
  3. Ching, C.C., Basham, J.D. & Jang, E. (2005). The legacy of the digital divide: gender, socioeconomic status, and early exposure as predictors of full-spectrum technology use among young adults. Urban Education, 40(4), 394-411.
  4. Czerniewicz L. & Ng'ambi, D. (2004). Students’ use of computers in UCT’s ‘walk-in’ laboratories. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 241-246.
  5. Duggan, A., Hess, B., Morgan, D., Kim, S., & Wilson, K.(2001). Measuring students’ attitudes toward educational use of the Internet. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(3), 267-281.
  6. Gibson, S. & Oberg, D. (2004). Wisions and realities of Internet use in schools: Canadian perspectives. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 569-585.
  7. Groves, M.M. & Zemel, P.C. (2000). Instructional Technology adoption in higher education: an action research case study. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(1), 57-65.
  8. Halpin, R. (1999). A model for constructivist learning in practice: Computer literacy integrated into elementary mathematics and science teacher education. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 128-138.
  9. Kay, R. (2006). Addressing gender differences in computer ability, attitudes and use: the laptop effect. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(2), 187-211.
  10. Judge, S., Puckett, K., & Cabuk, B. (2004). Digital Equity: new findings from the early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(4), 383-396.
  11. Kupperman, J. & Fishman, B.J. (2002). Academic, social, and personal uses of the Internet: cases of students from an urban Latino classroom. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 189-215.
  12. Maeers, M., Browne, N., & Cooper, E. (2000). Pedagogically appropriate integration of information technology 219-229.
  13. Milbrath, Y.L. & Kinzie, M.B. (2000). Computer technology training for prospective teachers: Computer attitudes and perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 373-396.
  14. Murphy, C. & Beggs, J. (2003). Primary pupils’ and teachers’ use of computers at home and school. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 79-83.
  15. National Center for Educational Statistics (2006). Computer and internet use by students in 2003. Retrieved September 5, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006065.pdf
  16. National Internet Development Agency of Korea (2008). Survey on the computer and internet usage. Seoul, Korea: Author.
  17. Pope, M., Hare, D., & Howard, E. (2002). Technology Integration: Closing the gap between what pre-service teachers are taught to do and what they can do. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 191-203.
  18. Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297-310.
  19. Vannatta, R.A. & Beyerbach, B. (2000). Facilitating a constructivist vision of technology integration among education faculty and pre-service teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 132-148.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.