You are here:

Design, Development and Evaluation of Pathways to Inquiry - Earth Science: An Inquiry Skill Analyzer and Activities Portal
PROCEEDINGS

, , , Louisiana State University, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Honolulu, HI, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-73-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

The Pathways to Inquiry Project (PTI) has developed two interrelated tools, an Inquiry Skill Analyzer (iSA) and an Inquiry Activity Portal (iAP). The iSA is designed for teachers to analyze and monitor the progress of their inquiry skills in different inquiry skill areas, as well as those of their students based on the National Science Education Standards. The iAP consists of activity matrices that are keyed to both Earth science content and specific science process skills. Pilot and evaluation studies were conducted in eight middle schools during 2007-2008 and ten middle schools in 2008-2009 academic years. Analyses of the inquiry assessments showed good content and discrimination validity and test reliability. Teachers found both tools easy to use and valuable in helping students to understand science inquiry skills and to engage in inquiry-based learning of Earth science content.

Citation

Lou, Y., Blanchard, P. & Carnaggio, J. (2009). Design, Development and Evaluation of Pathways to Inquiry - Earth Science: An Inquiry Skill Analyzer and Activities Portal. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2009--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 3301-3309). Honolulu, HI, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 15, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Beeth, M., Cross, L., Pearl, C., Pirro, J., Yagnesak, K., & Kennedy, J. (2001, March). A Continuum for Assessing Science Process Knowledge in Grades K-6. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 5(3).
  2. Bergeron, J. (2005). Self-serving bias in the interpretation of high stakes assessments. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of American Educational Research Association (AERA), April 21-26, Montreal, Canada.
  3. Bybee, R.W., Taylor, J.A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J.C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and application. Available at http://www.bscs.org/library/BSCS_5E_Model_Executive_Summary2006.pdf
  4. Downing, S.M. & Haladyna, T.M. (2006). Handbook of test development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  5. Enger, S.K. & Yager, R.E. (2001). Assessing student understanding in science: A standards-based K-12 handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  6. National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  7. National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  8. Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press.
  9. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: SpringerVerlag.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.