You are here:

Global Teams and Media Selection PROCEEDINGS

, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Honolulu, HI, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-73-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

Computer-mediated communication technologies (CMC) enable organizations to operate globally, transcending spatial, temporal, and organizational boundaries. Global virtual teams represent an increasingly apparent characteristic of global organizations and their use of global talent. The literature on virtual teams encompasses group structure, technology, socio-emotional processes, task processes, performance, and culture. This article offers a review of previously published research and analyzes it in order to ascertain what areas require further inquiry. By process of review, comparison, and reflection this article offers a clear picture on how virtual teams select the communication medium for the task at hand and what factors influence this decision.

Citation

Wiggins, B. (2009). Global Teams and Media Selection. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2009--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 705-710). Honolulu, HI, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 13, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Ahuja, M., & Galvin, J. (2003). Socialization in virtual groups. Journal of Management, 29, 161-185.
  2. Beamer, L., & Varner, I. (2008). Intercultural communication in the global workplace (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
  3. Bell, B., & Kozlowski, S. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group& Organization Management, 27, 14-49.
  4. Campbell, N. (2008, April 16). You’ve got mail! Using email technology to enhance intercultural communication learning. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 16. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr16/campbellnittaya.htm
  5. Carlson, J., & Davis, G. (1998). An investigation of media selection among directors and managers: From “self” to “other” orientation. MIS Quarterly, 22(3), 335-362.
  6. Cardon, P. (2008). A critique of Hall’s contexting model: A meta-analysis of literature on intercultural business and technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(4), 399-428.
  7. Cho, H., & Lee, J. (2008). Collaborative information seeking in intercultural computer-mediated communication groups. Communication Research, 35(4), 548-573.
  8. Clark, D., & Gibb, J. (2006). Virtual team learning: An introductory study team exercise. Journal of Management Education, 30, 765-787.
  9. Daft, R., Lengel, R., & Trevino, L. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 355-366.
  10. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.
  11. De Vries, R., van den Hooff, B., & De Ridder, J. (2006). Explaining knowledge sharing: The role of team communication styles, job satisfaction, and performance beliefs. Communication Research, 33(2), 115-135.
  12. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  13. Goodbody, J. (2005). Critical success factors for global virtual teams: Overcoming common obstacles to improve team performance. Strategic Communication Management, 9(2), 18-21.
  14. Hardin, A., Fuller, M., & Davison, R. (2007). I know I can, but can we? Culture and efficacy beliefs in global virtual teams. Small Group Research, 38, 1, 130-155.
  15. Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 3, 75-89.
  16. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s recent consequences: Using scores in theory and research. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1, 11-30.
  17. Humes, M., & Reilly, A. (2008). Managing intercultural teams: The eorganization exercise. Journal of Management Education, 32, 118-137.
  18. Inoue, Y. (2007, November 15). Cultural fluency as a guide to effective intercultural communication: the case of Japan and the U.S. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 15. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr15/inoue.htm
  19. Jarvenpaa, S., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. (1998). “Is there anybody out there?”Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29-64.
  20. Jarvenpaa, S., & Leidner, D. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791-815.
  21. Jones, R., Oyung, R., & Pace, L. (2005). Working virtually: Challenges of virtual teams. Hershey: IRM Press.
  22. Markman, K. (2009). “So what shall we talk about”: Openings and closings in chat-based virtual meetings. Journal of Business Communication, 46, 150-170.
  23. Martins, L., Gilson, L., & Maynard, M. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 805-835.
  24. Matveev, A., & Nelson, P. (2004). Cross cultural communication competence and multicultural team performance. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 4(2), 253-270.
  25. Matlay, H., & Westhead, P. (2005). Virtual teams and the rise of e-entrepreneurship in Europe. International Small Business Journal, 23, 279-302.
  26. Maznevski, M., & Chudoba, K. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11(5), 473-492.
  27. Nemiro, J. (2004). Creativity in virtual teams: Key components for success. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
  28. Olaniran, B. (2004). Computer-mediated communication in cross-cultural virtual teams. International& Intercultural Communication Annual, 27, 142-166.
  29. Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. The DataBase for Advances in Information Systems, 35 (1), 6-36.
  30. Reinsch, N., & Turner, J. (2006). Ari, r u there? Reorienting business communication for a technological era. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20(3), 339-356.
  31. Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: Across-disciplinary view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
  32. Russ, G., Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1990). Media selection and managerial characteristics in organizational communications. Management Communication Quarterly, 4(2), 151-175.
  33. Shachaf, P. (2005). Bridging cultural diversity through e-mail. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 8(2), 4660.
  34. Shachaf, P., & Hara, N. (2007). Behavioral complexity theory of media selection: A proposed theory for global virtual teams. Journal of Information Science, 33(1), 63-75.
  35. Shachaf, P. (2005). Bridging cultural diversity through e-mail. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 8(2), 4660.
  36. Søderberg, A., & Holden, N. (2002). Rethinking cross cultural management in a globalizing business world. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 2(1), 103-121.
  37. Timmerman, C., & Scott, C. (2006). Virtually working: Communicative and structural predictors of media use and key outcomes in virtual work teams. Communication Monographs, 73(1), 108-136.
  38. Thomas, G. (2007). How can we make our research more relevant? Bridging the gap between workplace changes and business communication research. Journal of Business Communication, 44, 283-296.
  39. Uber Grosse, C. (2002). Managing communication within virtual intercultural teams. Business Communication Quarterly, 65(4), 22-38.
  40. Ulijn, J., O’Hair, D., Weggeman, M., Ledlow, G., & Hall, H. (2000). Innovation, corporate strategy, and cultural context: What is the mission for international business communication? The Journal of Business Communication, 37(3), 293-317.
  41. Vallaster, C. (2005). Cultural diversity and its impact on social interactive processes: Implications from an empirical study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 5(2), 139-163.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.