You are here:

Online Learning Revisited: Adventure Learning 2.0
PROCEEDINGS

, , University of Minnesota, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Charleston, SC, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-67-9 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This paper describes a revised adventure learning framework for online learning that is a result of numerous online programs, over six years of research, and millions of students using programs that have been designed, developed, and delivered under the adventure learning umbrella. This newly restructured framework, entitled Adventure Learning 2.0, may represent the future of online learning – where teachers and students are delivering AL projects based on their local region of exploration and sharing their lesson goals and adventures online to collaborate with learners from around the world.

Citation

Doering, A. & Miller, C. (2009). Online Learning Revisited: Adventure Learning 2.0. In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2009--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3729-3735). Charleston, SC, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 19, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Aragaon, S., Johnson, S. & Najmuddin, S. (2002) The Influence of Learning Style Preferences on Student Success in Online Versus Face-to-Face Environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 16 (6), 227-244.
  2. Picciano A.G., & Seaman, J. (2007). K–12 Online Learning: A Survey of U.S. School District Administrators. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Retrieved, July 13, 2007, from http://www.sloanc.org/publications/survey/pdf/K-12_Online_Learning.pdf.
  3. Allen, I. & Seaman, J. (2006) Making the grade: Online learning in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Retrieved July 20, 2008, from http://www.sloanc.org/publications/survey/pdf/Making_the_Grade.pdf.
  4. Allen, I. & Seaman, J. (2007) Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Retrieved July 20, 2008, from http://www.sloan-C.org/publications/survey/pdf/ Online_nation.pdf.
  5. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 197-215.
  6. Doering, A. (2007). Adventure learning: Situating learning in an authentic context. Innovate-Journal of Online Education, 3(6). Retrieved on July 17, 2008 from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php? View=article&id=342.
  7. Doering, A, Hughes, J., & Scharber, C. (2007). Teaching and Learning Social Studies Online. In C. Cavanaugh, & R. Blomeyer (Eds.), What works in K-12 online learning (pp. 91-103). International Society for
  8. Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2007). An Investigation of the Use of Real-Time, Authentic Geospatial Data in the K-12 Classroom. Journal of Geography, Special Issue on Using Geospatial Data in Geographic Education, 106(6), 217-225.
  9. Dringus, L. & Terrell, S. (1999). The Framework for DIRECTED Online Learning Environments. The Internet and Higher Education. (2) 1, 55-67.
  10. Duffy, T., & Kirkley, J. (2004). Learner-centered theory and practices in distance education: Cases from higher education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  11. Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  12. National Research Council. (1999). Designing mathematics or science curriculum programs: A guide for using mathematics and science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  13. Picciano A.G., & Seaman, J. (2007). K–12 Online Learning: A Survey of U.S. School District Administrators. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Retrieved, July 13, 2007, from http://www.sloan-C.org/ Publications/survey/pdf/K-12_Online_Learning.pdf.
  14. Reeves, T., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2004). A development research agenda for online collaborative learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 53-65.
  15. Riedel, E., Doering, A., Scharber, C., & Ernst, D. (2007). “Timber for President”: Adventure Learning and Motivation. Paper presented at the 2007 American Educational Research Association conference, Chicago, IL.
  16. Sims, R., Dobbs, G., & Hand, T. (2002). Enhancing Quality in Online Learning: Scaffolding Planning and Design Through Proactive Evaluation. Distance Education, 23(2).
  17. Smith, R., Clark, T., & Blomeyer, R.L. (2005) A Synthesis of New Research on K–12 Online Learning. Retrieved July 12, 2007 from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/synthesis/synthesis.pdf. Swan, K. (2001) Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306-331.
  18. Watson, J. & Ryan, J. (2005) Keeping pace with online learning: A review of state level policy and practice. Retrieved, July 29, 2008, from http://www.nacol.org/docs/Keeping%20Pace%20with%20K DASHDASH

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.