You are here:

The Use of Web 2.0 Tools for Collaboration and the Development of 21st Century Skills PROCEEDINGS

, , Virginia Tech, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Charleston, SC, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-67-9 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop online pedagogy and evaluate the value of collaboration in its design in order to foster 21st century skills. A careful analysis of the process for converting existing face-to-face collaborative instruction into collaborative online instruction will be conducted. A strategy for this process will be developed. The procedures developed for the conversion process will be designed to maintain the computer-supported collaborative components of the original instructional unit using Web 2.0 tools.

Citation

Noe Black, A. & Falls, J. (2009). The Use of Web 2.0 Tools for Collaboration and the Development of 21st Century Skills. In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2009--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2628-2635). Charleston, SC, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 14, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Boettcher, J.V. & Conrad, R. (1999). Faculty Guide for Moving Teaching and Learning to the Web. Laguna Hills, CA: League for Innovation in the Community College.
  2. Center for Digital Education. (2004). Digital Community Colleges and the Coming of the "Millenials": Report of Major Findings. T.H.E. Journal, 32(3). CEO Forum (2001b). The CEO forum policy paper. Retrieved September 9, 2007, from http://www.ceoforum.org/reports.html
  3. Friedman, T.L. (2005). The World is Flat. NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  4. Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education I the 21st centur: A shift from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research to Open and Distance Learning 1(1), 1-17.
  5. Garrison, R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Unpublished manuscript.
  6. Gunawardena, C.N. (2004). Designing the social environment for online learning: The role of social presence. In D. Murphy, R. Carr, J. Tayor, & T. Wong (Eds), Distance education and technology: Issues and practice (pp.255-270). Hong Kong: Open University of Hong Kong Press.
  7. Gunawardena, C. & Duphorne, P. (2000). Predictors of learner satisfaction in an academic computer conference. Distance Education 21(1), 101-117.
  8. Gunawardena, C.N., & McIsaac, M.S. (2004). Distance education. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), The handbook of research on education communications and technology, 2nd Ed. (pp. 355-395). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
  9. Harasim, L., Calvert, T., & Groeneboer, C. (1996). Virtual-U: A web-based environment customized to support collaborative learning and knowledge building in postsecondary courses. Paper Presented at International Conference on Learning Sciences: Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Learning Science, Evanston, Illinois, P. 120-127.
  10. Hiltz, S. & Wellman, B. (1999). Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom. Communications of the ACM, (40)9, 44-49.
  11. International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). National Educational Technology Standards. [online]. Available: http://www.iste.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=NETS
  12. Jenkins, A., Healey, M., & Zetter, R. (2007). Linking teaching and research in discipline and departments. The Higher Education Academy, April.
  13. Kanuka, H., Collett, D., & Caswell, C. (2002). University instructor perceptions of the use of asynchronous text-based discussion in distance courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 151-167.
  14. Kearsley, G. & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. [online]. Available: http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm
  15. Koschmann, T. (1996). CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  16. LaPointe, D. & Gunawardena, C. (2004). Developing, testing and refining of a model to understand the relationship between peer interaction and learning outcomes in computer-mediated conferencing. Distance Education. 25(1), 83-105.
  17. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. NY: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Liu, Y. & Ginther, D.W. (2002). Instructional strategies for achieving a positive impression in computermediated communication distance education courses. Proceedings of the Annual Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference.
  19. Moore, M.G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3 (2), 1-6.
  20. Moore, M. & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory& Metiri Group. (2003). EnGauge: 21st century skills for 21st century learners. Available: http://www.ncrel.org/engauge/skills/engauge21st.pdf.
  21. O’Malley, C. (1995). Designing computer support for collaborative learning. In C.O’Malley’s Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 282-297.
  22. Palloff, R. & Pratt, K. (2001). The virtual student: A profile and guide to working with online learners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Publishing. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2007). Beyond the three Rs: Voter attitudes toward 21st century skills. Available: http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/documents/p21_pollreport_singlepg.pdf.
  23. Roschelle, J. & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving in C.O’Malley’s Computer supported Collaborative Learning. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 69-97.
  24. Rovai, A. (2001). Building Sense of Community at a Distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning [Online] 3 (1). Available: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/79/153
  25. Rovai, A. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. Internet and Hiegher Education. 6(1), 1-16.Rowntree, D. 1995. Teaching and Learning Online: A Correspondence Education for the 21st Century? British Journal of Educational Technology 26 (3): 205-215.
  26. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building. In R.K. Sawyer’s (Ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. NY: Cambridge University Press, 97-115.
  27. Siemens, G. (2002). Instructional design in Elearning. Elearnspace: everything elearning. Available: http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/InstructionalDesign.htm
  28. Sorensen, E., Takle, E., & Moser, H. (2006). Knowledge-building quality in online communities of practice: Focusing on learning dialogue. Studies in Continuing Education. 28(3), 241-257.
  29. Southern Regional Education Board. (2006). Standards for quality online teaching. [online]. Available: http://www.sreb.orgSta Hl, G. (2006). Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative
  30. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T. & Suthers, D.D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In R.K. Sawyer’s The Cambridge Handbook of The Learning Sciences. NY: Cambridge University Press, 409-425.
  31. Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 1(3). 315-337.
  32. Tu, C. (2002). How Chinese perceive social presence: An examination of an online learning environment. Educational Media International, 38(1),45-60.
  33. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  34. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. NY: Cambridge University Press. Wikipedia (N.D.). Web 2.0. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/ Accessed February 28, 2008.
  35. Xu, H. & Morris, L. (2007). Collaborative course development for online courses. Innovative Higher Education, 32(1), 35-40.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.