‘Is this thing on?’ University Student Preferences Regarding Audio Feedback
PROCEEDINGS
Kristen Cuthrell, Elizabeth Fogarty, Patricia Anderson, East Carolina University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Charleston, SC, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-67-9 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
Professors from a large southeastern university were interested in determining student preferences in receiving instructor feedback about their assignments. Both undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in teacher education courses were surveyed to determine whether they preferred to receive instructor electronic feedback through audio or written response after receiving both. Data indicated that the students did not show a strong preference for one form of electronic feedback over another, but some indicated learning style preferences for one form or another.
Citation
Cuthrell, K., Fogarty, E. & Anderson, P. (2009). ‘Is this thing on?’ University Student Preferences Regarding Audio Feedback. In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2009--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 32-35). Charleston, SC, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 19, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/30556/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & William, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86 (1). 8-21.
- Chappuis, S., & Chappuis, J. (2008). The best value informative assessment. Educational Leadership, 65 (4), 14-19.
- Driscoll, M. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Ice, P., Curtis, R., Wells, J., & Phillips, P. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and student sense of community. Journal of Asychronous Learning Networks, 11 (2), 3-25.
- Maag, M. (2006). IPod, uPod? An emerging mobile learning tool in nursing education and students’ satisfaction. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 23rd Annual Ascilite Conference: Who’s learning? Whose technology at the University of Sydney.
- Merry, S., & Orsmond, P. (2008, June). Students’ attitudes to and usage of academic feedback provided via audio files. Bioscience Education ejournal, 11. Retrieved June 11, 2008, from http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vo11/beej-11-3.pdf Mory, E.H. (2004). Feedback research revisited. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 745-783). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Stiggins, R. (2006). Assessment for learning: A key to motivation and achievement. Edge, 2 (2), 3-19.
- Stiggins, R., & Chappuis, J. (2006). What a difference a word makes: Assessment FOR learning rather than assessment OF learning helps students succeed. Journal of Staff Development, 27 (1), 10-14.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
Examining the impact of video feedback on instructor social presence in blended courses
Jered Borup, George Mason University; Richard West & Rebecca Thomas, Brigham Young University; Charles Graham
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 15, No. 3 (Jun 16, 2014)
-
Perceptions of Audio Feedback in Higher Education Assessment
Tania Broadley, Brian Von Konsky & David Pick, Curtin University, Australia
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2011 (Jun 27, 2011) pp. 2668–2673
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.