ELearning Usability Instruments What is being Evaluated? PROCEEDINGS
Joi L. Moore, Camille Dickson-Deane, Krista Galyen, Ngoc Vo, Mai Charoentham, University of Missouri, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-66-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
The process of evaluating the usability of e-Learning has included the use of varying instruments. These instruments have myriad factors and foci when attempting to provide an appropriate review of an e-Learning product. The variety of instruments and their embedded definitions creates some ambiguity when there is a need to review a particular e-Learning “unit”. The purpose of this paper is to initially provide a guide towards the development of an appropriate instrument to review the usability of an e-Course. This is en route to an instrument that can be manipulated to produce specific guides for the usability of any type of e-Learning product. As e-Learning products may have varying goals, instruments that can be manipulated would prove to be much more appropriate to the usability of all e-Learning products.
Moore, J.L., Dickson-Deane, C., Galyen, K., Vo, N. & Charoentham, M. (2008). ELearning Usability Instruments What is being Evaluated?. In C. Bonk, M. Lee & T. Reynolds (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2008--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 430-435). Las Vegas, Nevada, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 13, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29641/.
© 2008 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- Benson, L., Elliott, D., Grant, M., Holschuh, D., Kim, B., Kim, H. (2001). Heuristic evaluation instrument and protocol for eLearning programs. Retrieved September 21, 2008, from http://it.coe.uga.edu/~treeves/edit8350/heureval.rtf.
- Clark, R. (2002). Six principles of effective e-Learning: What works and why. The e-Learning Developer’s Journal.
- Dringus, L.P., & Cohen, M.S. (2005). An adaptable usability heuristic checklist for online courses. Frontiers in Education,
- Feldstein, M., & Neal, L. (2006). Designing usable, self-paced e-Learning courses: A practical guide. Elearn, 2006(8), Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=tutorials & Article=24-1
- Garrison, D.R. (2003). Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition. Elements of quality online education: Practice and direction, 4, 47-58.
- Koohang, A. (2004). Expanding the concept of usability. Informing Science Journal, 7(0), 129-141.
- Krauss, F., & Ally, M. (2005). A study of the design and evaluation of a learning object and implications for content development. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 1, 1-22.
- Nesbit, J, Belfer, K, Leacock, T. (2003). Learning object review instrument (LORI) manual 1.5. E-Learning Research and Assessment Network. Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://www.elera.net/eLera/Home/Articles/LORI%201.5.pdf.
- Nichols, M. (2003). A theory for elearning. Educational Technology& Society, 6(2), 1-10.
- Nyhof-Young, J., Walsh, L., & Stewart, P. (2002). Let ’ s ask the users! Development and implementation of an evaluation strategy for multimedia teaching software. Proceedings of the 2003 International Slice of Life Conference, University of Toronto, ON.
- Reeves, T.C., & Hedberg, J.G. (2003). Interactive learning systems evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications.
- Relan, A., & Gillani, B.B. (1997). Web-based instruction and the traditional classroom: similarities and differences. In B.H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 41-46). Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
- Tavangarian, D., Leypold, M.E., Nölting, K., Röser, M., & Voigt, D. (2004). Is e-Learning the solution for individual learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2(2), 273-280.
- Triacca, L., Bolchini, D., Botturi, L., & Inversini, A. (2004). Mile: Systematic usability evaluation for e-Learning web applications. Usability Professionals Association. What is Usability? Retrieved September 20, 2008, from http://www.upassoc.org/usability_resources/about_usability/definitions_of_usability.html
- Vargo, J., Nesbit, J.C., Belfer, K., & Archambault, A. (2003). Learning object evaluation: Computer-Mediated collaboration and inter-rater reliability. International Journal of Computers and Applications, 25(3), 198-205.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.