You are here:

Collaborative Online Learning Environment:Towards a process driven approach and collective knowledge building PROCEEDINGS

, , University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Canada

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vienna, Austria ISBN 978-1-880094-65-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

Teaching remains rooted in the practices of the past and continues to resist the lessons arising from educational research. Real reforms have been slow to take hold in educational systems around the world. Much of the reluctance can be attributed to a widely held misconception of the nature of learning. This project attempts to address this misconception through the development of an online learning environment that requires users to collaborative problem solving. The organizational structure and the central PBL tasks contained within the prototype of a Collaborative Online Learning Environment (COLE) will be described with preliminary reactions from users.

Citation

Desjardins, F. & vanOostveen, R. (2008). Collaborative Online Learning Environment:Towards a process driven approach and collective knowledge building. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 2563-2570). Vienna, Austria: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 16, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Gerber, S. & Scott, L. (2007). Designing a learning curriculum and technology’ srole in it. Education Tech Research Dev (2007) 55:461 – 478
  2. Hirumi R. (2002), A Framework for Analysing, Designing, and Sequencing Planned Elearning Interactions, The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3 (2), pp. 141-160
  3. Levy, P. (1994) L'intelligence collective: Pour une anthropologie du cyberespace, Paris: La Découverte, 246 pages.
  4. McPherson, M., Nunes, M.B. (2004). Developping Innovation in Online Learning: an Action Research Framework, London, UK: Routledge, 148 pages.
  5. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas, New York, Basic Books Inc.
  6. Piaget, J. (1977). La construction du réel chez l’ enfant (sixième édition). Paris : Delachaux et Niestlé.
  7. Pinch,T. (1996). The social construction of technology: A review. In Technological change: Methods and themes in the history of technology, edited by Robert Fox, Australia: Harwood Academic Publishers. 1735.
  8. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge, 608 pages.
  9. VanOostveen, R. (2005). Using action research for teacher professional development: Research in science and technology education. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Toronto: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, The University of Toronto.
  10. VanOostveen, R., Hunter, W., Kay, R., & Muirhead, W. (2007). Developing argumentation skills in high school students: A video-based case study in science education. Proceedings of the Ed-Media World Conference on Education Multimedia, Hypermedia& Telecommunications, Vancouver, BC, June 25-29, 2007, CDROM.
  11. Volery, T., Lord, D. (2000), Critical success factors in online education, The International Journal of Educational Management, 14 (5), pp. 216-223
  12. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical Constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.
  13. Wenger, E. (1999). Learning as Social Participation, Knowledge Manangment Review, (6) pp. 30-33

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.