You are here:

Development of a Dual User Adaptive Education System
PROCEEDINGS

, CRITE, Ireland

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vienna, Austria ISBN 978-1-880094-65-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

Research informs us of the benefit of parental involvement in learning activities in the home [2, 3]. However parental involvement may not occur due to lack of knowledge or a lack of belief in the benefit of their involvement [1]. The Parent and Child Tutor (P.A.C.T.) is one approach which may be of benefit in developing home tutoring best practice. P.A.C.T. is a novel Adaptive Education System (AES) in so far as it is a dual-user AES, which supports both the parent and child during the tutoring process. This paper describes how P.A.C.T.’s dual user architecture simultaneously supports both users, parent and child, through the provision of dual user models, dual domain models and an adaptive engine which comprises of a set of pedagogical rules. This paper describes the development and implementation of the dual user architecture.

Citation

Kelly, D. (2008). Development of a Dual User Adaptive Education System. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1768-1778). Vienna, Austria: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 22, 2023 from .

© 2008 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. D’ Mello, S. & Graesser, A. (2007) Mind and Body: Dialogue and Posture for Affect Detection in Learning Environments. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, LA, (pages 161 – 168) July 2007.
  2. Dornbusch, S.M., & Ritter, P.L. (1988). Parents of high school students: A neglected resource. Educational Horizons, 66, 7577.
  3. Gagné, R.M. (1985). Conditions of Learning. New York: Holt.
  4. Greenwood, G.E., & Hickman, C.W. (1991). Research and practice in parent involvement: Implications for teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 91, 278-288.
  5. Hickman, C.W., Greenwood, G.E., & Miller, M.D. (1995). High school parent involvement: Relationships with achievement, grade level, SES, and gender. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 28, 125-134.
  6. Hoover-Dempsey, K.V., & Sandler, H.M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’ s education? Review of Educational Research 67(1), 3-42.
  7. Hoover-Dempsey, K.V., & Sandler, H.M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’ s education? Review of Educational Research 67(1), 3-42.
  8. Kay, P.J., Fitzgerald, M., Paradee, C., & Mellencamp, A. (1994). Making homework work at home. The parent ’ s perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 550-561.
  9. Kort, B., Reilly, R., & Picard, R.W. (2001). An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: Reengineering educational pedagogy-building a learning companion. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Lahart, O., Kelly, D., Tangney, B., P.A.C.T. –
  10. Weber, G. And Brusilovsky, P. (2001) "ELM-ART: An adaptive versatile system for Web-based instruction". International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12 (4), Special Issue on Adaptive and Intelligent Web-based Educational Systems, 351-384.
  11. Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems. Los Altos, CA.: Morgan Kaufmann.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read