You are here:

An Eye Tracking Study: The Effects of Individual Differences on Navigation Patterns and Recall Performance on Hypertext Environments PROCEEDINGS

, , , Middle East Technical University, Turkey

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vienna, Austria ISBN 978-1-880094-65-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

This study examined the influence of cognitive styles on navigation patterns in hypertext environment. 20 undergraduate students from the Foreign Language Department were pre-tested on their cognitive styles, computer use and ability and prior knowledge about content presented in hypertext environment. All participants completed the Group-Embedded Figures Test (GEFT), Internet Influence and prior knowledge tests. Then they were asked to complete 6 tasks and navigate on a hypertext material on the planet Neptune. While they were reading the material, their eye movements were recorded by on eye-tracker device. The results were analyzed by measuring the fixation duration and eye-gaze points of the participants with regard to visited, revisited page numbers and navigation complexity. At the end of the study a recall performance test was applied. Results showed that cognitive style has no effect on recall performance, and navigational pattern while eye-fixation number on relevant information has significant effect on retention.

Citation

Karakus, T., Sancar, H. & Cagiltay, K. (2008). An Eye Tracking Study: The Effects of Individual Differences on Navigation Patterns and Recall Performance on Hypertext Environments. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1272-1278). Vienna, Austria: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 15, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bevilacqua, A.F. (1989). Hypertext: Behind the Hype. “ ERIC Digest. ” Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources. (ERIC Doc. Repro. Service No. ED 308 882)
  2. Bunz, U.K. & Sypher, H.E. (2004). The Computer– Email-Web (CEW) Fluency scale-Development and Validation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17 (4), Pp. 479-506.
  3. Chen, C. & Rada, R. (1996). Interacting with Hypertext: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies. Human-Computer Interaction, 11 (2), Pp. 125-156.
  4. Chen, S.Y. & Macredie R.D. (2002).Cognitive Styles and Hypermedia Navigation: Development of a learning Model. Journal Of The American Society For Information Science And Technology, 53(1), Pp.3 – 15.
  5. Calcaterra, A., Antonietti, A. & Underwood J. (2005). Cognitive Style, Hypermedia Navigation and Learning. Computers& Education, 44 (4), Pp. 441-457.
  6. De Jong, T. & VanDer Hulst, A. (2002). The Effects of Graphical Overviews on Knowledge Acquisition in Hypertext. Journal of Computer Assist Learning, 18 (2), Pp. 219-231.
  7. Ford, N. & Chen, S. (2000). Individual Differences, Hypermedia Navigation, and Learning: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9 (4), Pp. 281-311.
  8. Graff, M. (2003). Learning from web-based instructional systems and cognitive style. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34 (4). Pp.407 – 418.
  9. Graff, M. (2005). Individual Differences in Hypertext Browsing Strategies. Behaviour& Information Technology, 24 (2), Pp. 9399.
  10. Graff, M. (2006). Constructing and Maintaining an Effective Hypertext-Based Learning Environment: Web Based Learning. Education+ Training, 48 (2/3), Pp. 143-155.
  11. Herder, E. & Juvina, I. (2004). Discovery of Individual User Navigation Styles. Proc. Of Workshop on Individual Differences in Adaptive Hypermedia at Adaptive Hypermedia 2004.
  12. Lawless, K.A., Brown, S.W. & Mills, R. (1998). Knowledge, Interest, Recall and Navigation: A look at Hypertext Processing. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, San Diego, CA. Lin, Chi-Hui & Davidson, G. (1994). Effects of linking structure and Cognitive Style on Students’ performance and attitude in a computer-based Hypertext Environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15 (4), Pp.317-329.
  13. Parkinson, A. & Redmond, J.A. (2003). Do Cognitive Styles Affect Learning Performance in Different Computer Media? British Journal of Educational Technology, 34 (4), Pp 385-392
  14. Richter, E.M., Engbert, R. & Kliegl, R. (2006). Current advances in SWIFT. Cognitive Systems Research, 7 (1). Pp. 23– 33
  15. Yecan, E. (2005). Learning Strategies Of Students With Different Cognitive Styles In A Hypermedia Environment. Unpublished Master Dissertation.
  16. Warnick, B. (2005). Looking into the Future: Electronic Texts and the Deeping Interface. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14 (3), Pp. 327– 333.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.