You are here:

The Status of Professional Development for K-12 Online Teachers: Insights and Implications
Article

, , Boise State University, United States

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 17, Number 4, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

The authors share findings, insights, and implications from “Going Virtual! The Status of Professional Development for K12 Online Teachers,” a 2007 report supported by the North American Council for Online Learning (NACOL, now known as iNACOL). The authors conducted a national survey of 259 K-12 online teachers, administrators, and professional development trainers to gain baseline information on the status of K-12 online teacher professional development. This paper provides three main insights from the study: the influence of evolving context on professional development; the broad continuum of professional development practices & models; and global and situation-specific professional development needs. It discusses implications for K12 online teacher professional development practice, policy, and research.

Citation

Rice, K. & Dawley, L. (2009). The Status of Professional Development for K-12 Online Teachers: Insights and Implications. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 523-545. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved December 17, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Barbour, M., Kinsella, J., Wicks, M., & Toker, S. (2009). Continuing change in a virtual world: Training and retraining instructors. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 437-458.
  2. Berliner, D. (1994). Expertise: The wonder of exemplary performances. In J. Mangieri & C. Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives (pp. 161-186). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.
  3. Clark, T. (2001). Virtual schools: Trends and issues: A study of virtual schools in the United States [Electronic version]. Malcomb, IL: Western Illinois University.
  4. Compton, L.K., Davis, N.E. & Mackey, J. (2009). Field experience in virtual schools— To be there virtually [Special issue]. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 459-478.
  5. Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 383-412.
  6. Dawley, L. (2007). The tools for successful online teaching. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing,
  7. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.
  8. Fulton, K. (2002). Brave new world of virtual schooling in the U.S. National Association of State Boards of Education (NASBE). Retrieved July 29, 2009, from http://www.nasbe .org/index.php
  9. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
  10. Gross, D., Truesdale, C., & Bielec, S. (2001). Backs to the wall : Supporting teacher professional development with technology. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(2), 161-183.
  11. Hassel, B. C., & Terrell, M. G. (2004). How can virtual schools be a vibrant part of meeting the choice provisions of the no child left behind act? White paper. Retrieved July 29, 2009, from http://www.doe.virginia.gov/VDOE/Instruction/title1/Hassel-Terrell-VirtualSchools.pdf
  12. Ketelhut, D. J., McCloskey, E., Dede, C., Breit, L., & Whitehouse, P. (2006). Core tensions in the evolution of online teacher professional development. In C. Dede (Ed.), Online professional development for teachers: Emerging models and methods (pp. 237-263). Cambridge, Ma: Harvard Education Press.
  13. Knapp, L. (1996). Restructuring schools with technology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Larreamendy-Joerns, J., & Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the distance with online education. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 567-605.
  14. Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575-614.
  15. Long, A. (2004). Cyber schools. Retrieved July 29, 2009, from the Education Commission of the States Website http://www.ecs.og/clearinghouse/51/01/5101.pdf
  16. Lowes, S. (2007). Professional development for online teachers. In C. Cavanaugh & B. Blomeyer (Eds.), What works in K-12 online learning. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
  17. National Education Association (NEA). (2006). Guide to teaching online courses. Retrieved July 29, 2009, from http://www.nea.org/home/30103.htm
  18. National Foundation for the Improvement of Education (NFIE). (1996). Teachers take charge of their learning: Transforming professional development for student success. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from http://www.neafoundation.org/publications/takecharge.htm
  19. North American Council for Online Learning (NACOL). (2008). National standards for quality online teaching. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from http://www.nacol.org/
  20. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL). (1999). State policy on professional development: Rethinking the linkages to student outcomes. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from http://www.ncrel.org/quality/policy/index.html
  21. Picciano, A. G., & Seaman, J. (2009). K-12 online learning: A follow-up of the survey of U. S. School district administrators. Retrieved July 29, 2009, from the Sloan Consortium website http://www.sloan-C.org/publications/sutvey/k-12online2008
  22. Rice, K. L. (2006). A comprehensive look at distance education in the k-12 context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 425-447.
  23. Rice, K., & Dawley, L. (2007, November). Going virtual! The status of professional development for k-12 online teachers. Research report presented at the Virtual School Symposium. Louisville, KY. Supported by NACOL. Retrieved April 30, 2008, from http://edtech.boisestate.edu/goingvirtual/goingvirtual1.pdf
  24. Southern Regional Education Board (SREB). (2006). Standards for quality online teaching. Retrieved August 19, 2007, from http://www.sreb.org/programs/EdTech/pubs/PDF/StandardsQualityOnlineTeaching.asp
  25. Southern Regional Education Board (SREB). (2007). Report on state virtual schools. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from http://www.sreb.org/programs/EdTech/SVS/2007_report_on_state_virtual_schools.pdf
  26. Sternberg, R. J., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2001). Complex cognition: The psychology of human thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
  27. U. S. Department of Education (USDOE). (2004). Toward a new golden age in American education: How the internet, the law and today’s students are revolutionizing expectations. National Education Technology Plan 2004. Washington DC: Author.
  28. Watson, J., & Ryan, J. (2006). Keeping pace with K–12 online learning: A review of statelevel policy and practice. Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory at Learning Point Associates. Retrieved January 9, 2007, from http://www.nacoL.org/docs/Keeping%20Pace%20with%20K-12%20Online%20Learning%202006.pdf
  29. Watson, J., & Ryan, J. (2007). Keeping pace with K–12 online learning: A review of statelevel policy and practice. Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory
  30. Watson, J., Gemin, B., & Ryan, J. (2008). Keeping pace with k-12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and practice. Evergreen, CO: Evergreen Consulting.
  31. Web-Based Education Commission. (2000). The power of the internet for learning: Moving from promise to practice. Retrieved July 29, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/offices/AC/WBEC/FinalReport/index.html
  32. Yin, R. K. (1993). Applications of case study research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Transforming Teacher Preparation: Assessing Digital Learners’ Needs for Instruction in Dual Learning Environments

    Susan Poyo, Franciscan University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2018 (Mar 26, 2018) pp. 1682–1689

  2. SITE Joint SIG Symposia: A Collaboration Between the K-12 Online Learning SIG and Distance Learning SIG: How Higher Education and K-12 Online Learning Research Can Impact Each Other

    Rick Ferdig, Kent State University, United States; Leanna Archambault, Arizona State University, United States; Kerry Rice, Boise State University, United States; Margaret Niess, Oregon State University, United States; Trisha Litz, Regis University, United States; Amy Garrett-Dikkers, University of North Carolina Wilmington, United States; Aimee Whiteside, University of Tampa, United States; Michael Barbour, Touro University, United States; David Marcovitz, Loyola University Maryland, United States; Antoinette Davis, Eastern Kentucky University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2017 (Mar 05, 2017) pp. 635–639

  3. Standards Based Design: Teaching K-12 Educators to Build Quality Online Courses

    René E. Quiroz, Nicola L. Ritter, Yun Li, Rhonda C. Newton & Trupti Palkar, Texas A&M University, United States

    Journal of Online Learning Research Vol. 2, No. 2 (Aug 01, 2016) pp. 123–144

  4. Teaching Practices and Teacher Perceptions in Online World Language Courses

    Chin-Hsi Lin & Binbin Zheng, Michigan State University, United States

    Journal of Online Learning Research Vol. 1, No. 3 (December 2015) pp. 275–303

  5. Teaching Online: Prospective Online Teachers’ Experiences and Prioritized Areas for Training

    Yu-Hui Ching, Yu-Chang Hsu & Kerry Rice, Boise State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 234–239

  6. Virtual School Teaching: Establishing a Framework for K-12 Virtual School Professional Development Programs

    Meredith DiPietro & Mark Sivy, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (Mar 07, 2011) pp. 3447–3453

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.