You are here:

Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs) in Mathematics Teacher Education
Article

, Cleveland State University, United States ; , , University of North Dakota, United States

AACE Review (formerly AACE Journal) Volume 17, Number 2, ISSN 1065-6901 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Rapid increases in knowledge and technology call for the use of such tools as a personal digital assistant (PDA) to increase the quality of education and student performance. PDAs evolved from personal organizers, but today’s handhelds can be effective tools that help students organize facts and concepts, develop written documents, understand science and math concepts, provide tools that help to empower students with special needs. This article gives an overview of the current use of handheld computers or PDAs in teacher education. Specifically, this article explores the potential of these tools in mathematics teacher education within the framework of mathematics education reform. This article shows that with appropriate software, the PDA can support a variety of effective learning activities that support the goals of reform in mathematics. Further, the authors show that preservice teachers who participated in the sessions with PDAs developed positive attitudes towards their use.

Citation

Wachira, P., Keengwe, J. & Onchwari, G. (2009). Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs) in Mathematics Teacher Education. AACE Review (formerly AACE Journal), 17(2), 113-125. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved July 3, 2022 from .

© 2009 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13-20.
  2. Curtis, M., Williams, B., Norris, C., O’Leary, D., & Soloway, E. (2003). Palm handheld computers: A complete resource for classroom teachers. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
  3. Fisher, T. (1999, March). A new professionalism? Teacher use of multimedia portable computers with internet capability. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education 10th International Conference, San Antonio, TX.
  4. Franklin, T., Sexton, C., Lu, Y. & Ma, H. (2007). PDAs in teacher education: A case study examining mobile technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 15(1), 39-57.
  5. Garofalo, J., Drier, H., Harper, S., Timmerman, M.A., & Shockey, T. (2000). Promoting appropriate uses of technology in mathematics teacher preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(1), 66-88.
  6. International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). National educational technology standards. Retrieved May 28, 2007, from http://cnets.iste.org/
  7. Martin, W.G., & Strutchens, M.E. (2000). Geometry and measurement. In E.A. Silver& P.A. Kenney (Eds.), Results from the seventh mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress (pp. 193–234).
  8. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  9. Penuel, W.R., Tatar, D.G., & Rochelle, J. (2004). The role of research on contexts of teaching practice in informing the design of handheld learning technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4), 353-370.
  10. Rochelle, J., & Pea, R. (2002). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Cognition and Technology, 1(1), 145-168.
  11. Soloway, E. (2000). Supporting science inquiry in K-12 using Palm computers: A Palm manifesto. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Highly-Interactive Computing in Education. Retrieved August 19, 2008, from http://www.pdaed.com/ Features/palmmanifesto.xml
  12. Thornton, R.K. (1997). Learning physics concepts in the introductory course: Microcomputer-based labs and interactive lecture demonstrations. In J. Wilson (Ed.), Conference of the introductory physics course (pp. 69-86). New
  13. Tinker, R., Staudt, C., & Walton, D. (2002). The handheld computer as field guide. Learning and Leading with Technology, 30(1), 36-41.
  14. Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 65(3), 94-95.
  15. Williams, B. (2004). We’re getting wired, we’re going mobile, what’s next? Fresh ideas for educational technology planning. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections