You are here:

Using Research Modeling Methods to Enhance Teacher Education Students’ Practice in Technology Integration

, University of Nevada, Reno, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-64-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


In research of using information technology in teaching education, many researchers have found some effective or better methods to improve teaching and learning. However, when other educators are trying to learn from the research, or duplicate the experiences, they usually find hard to follow. Research modeling has been found a useful tool to connect research findings to practice. Modeling is a systematic process that first identifies and detects the critical components in a field of research, then establishes the connections among the components, and presents the components and their relationships. The purposes of this paper are (a) to introduce a method of modeling, and demonstrate types and examples of research modeling; and (b) to present the author's experience to use this modeling method in helping teacher education students connect research findings to their technology integration practice.


Liu, L. (2008). Using Research Modeling Methods to Enhance Teacher Education Students’ Practice in Technology Integration. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2008--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1174-1179). Las Vegas, Nevada, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 23, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Liu, L., & Cummings, R. (2001). A learning model that stimulates geometric thinking through use of PCLogo and Geometer’s Sketchpad. Computers in the Schools, 17(1-2), 85-104.
  2. Johnson, D.L., & Liu, L. (2000). First steps toward a statistically generated information technology integration model. Computers in the Schools, 16(2), 3-12.
  3. Liu, L., & Johnson, D.L. (2005). Web-based resources and applications: Quality and influence. Computers in the Schools, 21(3-4), 131-147.
  4. Liu, L., & Jones, P. (2004). Impact of online communication design on student motivation and performance. Journal of Research on Education, 14(1), 40-56.
  5. Liu, L., & Maddux, C. (2005). Influences of course design on student evaluations: An initial logistic prediction model. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 16(1), 125-148.
  6. Liu, L., Maddux, C., & Johnson, L. (2004). Computer attitude and achievement: Is time an intermediate variable? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(4), 593-607.
  7. Liu, L., & Velasques-Bryant, N.J. (2003). An information technology integration system and its lifecycle: What is missing? Computers in the Schools, 20(1-2), 93-106.
  8. Liu, L., & Johnson, D.L. (1999). What influenced the quality of research: Findings from an editorial management database. Computers in the Schools, 15(3-4), 53-66.
  9. Liu, L., & Johnson, L. (1998). A computer achievement model: Computer attitude and computer achievement. Computers in the Schools, 14(3-4), 33-54.
  10. Liu, L., & Maddux, C. (2008). Examining the predictive validity of an instrument: Technology attitudes and learning. Computers in the Schools, 25(1/2), In press.
  11. Liu, L. (2007). Modeling in Information Technology Research: A Model of Models. Presented at AECT (Association of Educational Communications and Technology), Anaheim, California, October 2327, 2007.
  12. Low, G. (2003). Validating metaphoric models in applied linguistics. Metaphor& Symbol, 18(4), 239-255.
  13. Rojewski, J.W., & Bakeman, R. (1997). Log-linear modeling and analysis: Reflections on the use of multivariate categorical data in social science research. Exceptionality, 7(2), 199-204.
  14. Rowe, K.J., & Hill, P.W. (1998). Modeling educational effectiveness in classrooms: The use of multi-level structural equations to model students' progress. Educational Research& Evaluation, 4(4), 233-288.
  15. Van Batenburg, A., & Laros, A. (2002). Graphical analysis of test items.. Educational Research& Evaluation, 8(3), 339-354.
  16. Wilkins, J.L.M., & Ma, X. (2003). Modeling change in student attitude toward and beliefs about mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 52-64.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact