You are here:

An Exploration of Two Online Approaches to Mathematics Teacher Education
Article

, , Salisbury University, United States

JCMST Volume 28, Number 3, ISSN 0731-9258 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the nature of the discourse generated by two different online approaches to mathematics teacher professional development. Thirty mathematics teachers participated in online activities involving analysis and discourse about artifacts of teaching practice. Half were randomly assigned to a group that analyzed and discussed students work samples, and the other half to a group focused upon descriptions of classroom teaching episodes. Teachers formed threads of conversation on asynchronous discussion boards as they considered the different aspects of each artifact. Within the threads, different orientations toward the reform agenda in mathematics education were shown. Some messages were strongly rooted in the reform paradigm, others in the traditional paradigm, and many others contained elements characteristic of each paradigm. The distribution and characteristics of the messages reflected teachers’ frequent attempts to try to reconcile the largely incompatible paradigms undergirding reform-oriented and traditional approaches to mathematics instruction. This paper describes the nature of the discourses occurring within each group of teachers with the aim of providing empirical grounds to inform the actions of teacher educators and researchers designing online learning environments that attempt to bring teachers more fully into the reform-oriented discourse about teaching mathematics.

Citation

Groth, R. & Burgess, C. (2009). An Exploration of Two Online Approaches to Mathematics Teacher Education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 28(3), 221-246. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 12, 2019 from .

© 2009 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.) The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson& M. Holquist, trans), university of texas Press, austin. Ball, D.L. (1996). Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms: What we think we know and what we need to learn. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 500-509.
  2. Barnett, C. (1991). Building a case-based curriculum to enhance the pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 42, 263-272.
  3. Barnett, C. (1998). Mathematics teaching cases as a catalyst for informed strategic inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 81-93.
  4. Borasi, R., & Fonzi, J. (2002). Professional development that supports school mathematics reform (Foundations Monograph no. 3). Arlington, Va: national science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02084/start.htm
  5. Grossman, P. (2005). Research on pedagogical approaches in teacher education. In M. Cochran-smith& K.M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 425476).
  6. Groth, R.E. (2007). Case studies of mathematics teachers’ learning in an online study group. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [online serial], 7(1). Available: http://www.citejournal.org/vol7/iss1/mathematics/article1.cfm
  7. Kellog, M. & Kersaint, G. (2004). Creating a vision for the standards using online videos in an elementary mathematics methods course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4 (1), 23-34.
  8. Merryfield, M.M. (2001). The paradoxes of teaching a multicultural education course online. Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 283-299.
  9. Wertsch, J.V. (1997). Mind as action. Oxford university Press, new York.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections