You are here:

Using Mobile Technologies and Podcasts to Enhance Learning Experiences in Lecture-Based University Course Delivery PROCEEDINGS

, , Edith Cowan University, Australia

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vancouver, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-62-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC


This paper describes a study that sought to explore the use of mobile technologies as a means to enhance the learning experience of students in a tertiary course of study. In particular the study involved the development of podcasting and vodcasting as an alternative to lecturing. Digital lectures were created to replicate the content usually presented in formal lectures. Students were able to access the lectures through such mobile devices as iPods and wireless enabled computers. The study sought to explore how students used these digital resources and the educational advantages that were achieved.


Oliver, R. & Luca, J. (2007). Using Mobile Technologies and Podcasts to Enhance Learning Experiences in Lecture-Based University Course Delivery. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2007--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 3385-3394). Vancouver, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 14, 2018 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Baker, P., Bakshis, R. & Tolone, W. (1974). Diversifying learning opportunities: A response to the problems of mass education. Research in Higher Education, 2 (23), 251-263.
  2. Barnett, J. (2006). Implementation of personal response units in very large lecture classes: Student perceptions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 474-494.
  3. Biggs, J. (2001). The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 221-238.
  4. Bligh, D. (2000). What’s the use of lectures? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Draper, S.W. & Brown, M.I. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 81-94.
  6. Fardon, M. & Ludewig A. (2000). ILectures: A Catalyst for Teaching and Learning in R. Sims et al (Eds). Learning to Choose: Choosing to Learn. Proceedings of ASCILITE 2000. Coffs Harbour (pp45 DASHDASH
  7. Goldstein, G., & Venassi, B. (2006). Students' and instructors' beliefs about excellent lecturers and discussion leaders. Research in Higher Education, 47(6), 243-264.
  8. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies (2nd ed.). London: Routledge/Falmer.
  9. Ochoa, T., & Robinson, J. (2005). Revisiting group consensus: Collaborative learning dynamics during a problem-based learning activity in education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 28(1), 10-20.
  10. Oliver, R. (2006). Exploring a technology-facilitated solution to cater for advanced students in large undergraduate classes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 1-12.
  11. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
  12. Reeves, T., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2005). Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16 (2), 96-115.
  13. Robertson L. (2000). Twelve tips for using a computerized interactive audience response system. Medical Teacher, 22(3), 237-239.
  14. Sharma, M.D., Khachan, J., Chan, B. & O'Byrne, J. (2005). An investigation of the effectiveness of electronic classroom communication systems in large lecture classes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(2), 137-154.
  15. Wikipedia (2006). Podcast, retrieved 12 December 2006 from

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact