You are here:

Originality and Plagiarism Resources for Academic Staff Development in the Era of New Web Authoring Formats PROCEEDINGS

, The University of Melbourne, Australia

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vancouver, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-62-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

This paper focuses on academic integrity and plagiarism implications of extending the conventions of academic writing to accommodate the growing public use of a range of widely available web authoring methods, such as wikis and blogs, social bookmarking, and podcasting. In the web 2.0 world there are many aspects of originality and plagiarism that are neglected or avoided in conversations about academic work. This paper describes a project that seeks to refine academic approaches to web 2.0 authoring, as part of providing an integrated set of originality and plagiarism resources for staff development, and reports initial feedback from independent peer review of these resources. The paper also outlines further evaluation studies and staff development initiatives required to bring systematic improvement to this aspect of academic work.

Citation

Gray, K. (2007). Originality and Plagiarism Resources for Academic Staff Development in the Era of New Web Authoring Formats. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2007--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 2404-2411). Vancouver, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 16, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Asmar, C. (2002). Strategies to enhance learning and teaching in a research-extensive university. International Journal for Academic Development, 7(1), 18-30.
  2. Conradson, S., & Hernández-Ramos, P. (2004). Computers, the internet, and cheating among secondary school students: Some implications for educators. Practical Assessment, Research& Evaluation, 9(9). Retrieved December 15, 2006 from http://www.pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9 & N=9
  3. Guskey, T.R. (1999, April) New perspectives on evaluating professional development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, 19-23 April.
  4. Hasen, M., & Huppert, M. (2005, November). The Trial of Damocles: An investigation into the incidence of plagiarism at an Australian university. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Parramatta, N.S.W. Retrieved December 15, 2006 from http://www.aare.edu.au/05pap/has05273.pdf
  5. Kandlbinder, P. (2003). Peeking under the covers: on-line academic staff development in Australia and the United Kingdom. International Journal for Academic Development, 8(1-2), 135-143.
  6. Kirkpatrick, D. (1998). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. 2nd edn. New York: Berrett-Koehler.
  7. Lamb, B. (2004). Wide open spaces: Wikis, ready or not. EDUCAUSE Review, 39(5), 36-48. Retrieved December 15, 2006 from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0452.pdf
  8. Land, R. (2001). Agency, context and change in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development,.6(1), 4-20.
  9. Marshall, S., & Garry, M. (2005). How well do students really understand plagiarism? In H. Goss (Ed.), Balance, Fidelity, Mobility: Proceedings of the 2005 ASCILITE Conference, Brisbane: QUT. Retrieved December 15, 2006 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane05/blogs/proceedings/52_Marshall.pdf
  10. Martin, A. (2005). The landscape of digital literacy. DigEu Lit Project. Retrieved March 1, 2007 from: http://www.digeulit.ec/docs/public.asp
  11. McKeith, W. (2005, June 10). Great expectations fuel the rise of school plagiarism. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved December 15, 2006, from http://www.smh.com.au/news/Opinion/Great-expectations-fuel-the-rise-of-schoolplagiarism/2005/06/09/1118123958126.html
  12. McKiernan, G. (2005) Quality assurance in the age of author self-archiving. Proceedings of The Association of College and Research Librarians Twelfth National Conference (pp.190-195). Retrieved December 15, 2006, from
  13. Nentwich, M. (2005). Quality control in academic publishing: Challenges in the age of cyberscience. Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science, 3(2), 181-198.
  14. Nillson, L., Eklof, A., & Ottosson, T. (2005, August). What's so original? The discourse on education and dishonesty in the wake of a technological revolution. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Nicosia, Cyprus. Retrieved March 1, 2007 from http://www.distans.hkr.se/ILLwebb/Earli_paper2005_whats_so_original_final.pdf
  15. Phillips, R. (2005). Audit of Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Issues in Australia and New Zealand. Murdoch University/ ACODE. Retrieved December 15, 2006 from http://www.tlc.murdoch.edu.au/project/acode/
  16. Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts, and Other Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms. Thousand Oaks, California, USA. Corwin Press.
  17. Rojas, P. (2002, August). Bootleg culture. Retrieved December 15, 2006 from http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2002/08/01/bootlegs/print.html
  18. Rowland, S. (2002). Overcoming fragmentation in professional life: The challenge for academic development. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(1), 52-64.
  19. Sigthorsson, G. (2005). Copy/paste: The joys of plagiarism. M/C Journal, 8(3). Retrieved December 15, 2006 from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0507/04-sigthorsson.php
  20. Vuorikari, R. (2005). Can personal digital knowledge artefacts’ management and social networks enhance learning? European Schoolnet/ Insight Observatory for New Technologies and Education. Special Report. 5 October 2005. Retrieved December 15, 2006 from http://www.eun.org/insight DASHDASH

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.