You are here:

Instant Messaging between Students and Faculty: A Tool for Increasing Student-Faculty Interaction
Article

, James Madison University, United States ; , Virginia Tech, United States

International Journal on E-Learning, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

This study explores the pedagogical potential of instant messaging in a communication course. Two instructors made themselves available to students via instant messaging as a supplement to other modes of communication (e.g., e-mail, office hours). In order to gauge students' reactions to and use of the technology, the researchers kept logs of faculty-student interactions and administered a student survey. The results suggest that students will use instant messaging with their instructors for typical academic purposes. Students reported that instant messaging helped academically and enhanced both the quantity and quality of interactions with their instructor. Faculty perceived the technology as offering new teaching tools and supporting rather than hindering instructional needs. The data also suggest using instant messaging does not decrease other forms of faculty-student communication. Overall, both students and instructors found instant messaging a useful educational tool.

Citation

Hickerson, C.A. & Giglio, M. (2009). Instant Messaging between Students and Faculty: A Tool for Increasing Student-Faculty Interaction. International Journal on E-Learning, 8(1), 71-88. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 6, 2023 from .

© 2009 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Althaus, S. L. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with on-line discussions. Communication Education, 46, 158-174.
  2. American Online (2004). America Online Inc.'s second annual instant messaging trends survey shows instant messaging has gone mainstream [News Release]. American Online: Dulles, Virginia.
  3. American Online (2005). Third Annual AOL Instant Messaging Trends Survey Finds IM Has Taken Over the Desktop [News Release]. American Online: Dulles, Virginia.
  4. Atamian, R. & DeMoville, W. (1998). Office hours – none. College Teaching, 46, 31-35. Bailey, E. K., & Cotlar, M. (1994). Teaching via the Internet. Communication Education, 43, 184-193. D’Souza, P. V. (1992). E-mail’s role in the learning process: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25, 254-264.
  5. Dobransky, N.D., & Frymier, A.B. (2004). Developing teacher-student relationships through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52, 211-223.
  6. Duran, R. L., Kelly, L., & Keaten, J. A. (2005). College faculty use and perceptions of electronic mail to communicate with students. Communication Quarterly, 53, 159-176.
  7. Fusani, D.S. (1994). “Extra-class” communication: Frequency, immediacy, self-disclosure, and satisfaction in student-faculty interaction outside the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 232-255.
  8. Haworth, B. (1999). An analysis of the determinants of student e-mail use. Journal of Education for Business, 75, 55-59.
  9. Hiltz, S. R. (1986). The “virtual classroom:” Using computer-mediated communication for university teaching. Journal of Communication, 36, 95-104.
  10. Jaasma, M.A., & Koper, R.J. (1999). The relationship of student-faculty out-of-class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48, 41-47. Keaten, J.A., & Kelly, L.
  11. Kelly, L., Duran, R. L., & Zolten, J. J. (2001). The effect of reticence on college students’ use of electronic mail to communicate with faculty. Communication Education, 50, 170-176. Kelly, L., Keaten, J. A., & Finch, C. (2004). Reticent and non-reticent college students’ preferred communication channels for interacting with faculty. Communication Research Reports, 21, 197-209.
  12. Kuh, G. D. (1995). The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. The Journal of Higher Education, 66, 123-155. McComb, M.
  13. Nadler, M. K., & Nadler, L.B. (2000). Out of class communication between faculty and students: A faculty perspective. Communication Studies, 51, 176-188.
  14. Rice, M. L., & Miller, M. T. (2001). Faculty involvement in planning for the use and integration of instructional and administrative technologies. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(3), 328-336.
  15. Shiu, E. & Lenhart, A. (2004). How Americans use instant messaging. Pew Internet & American Life Project: Washington, D.C.
  16. Terenzini, P.T., Pascarella, E.T., & Blimling, G.S. (1996). Students’ out-of-class experiences and their influence on learning and cognitive development: A literature review. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 149-162.
  17. Waldeck, J. H., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (2001). Teacher e-mail message strategies: Willingness to communicate online. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 54-70.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.