You are here:

Transitioning From Paper-Based to Electronic Teaching Portfolios: Student Perceptions and Recommendations
PROCEEDINGS

, Northern Kentucky University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in San Antonio, Texas, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-61-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Abstract: This paper documents a yearlong pilot study, conducted by teacher education faculty to evaluate methods for creating, sustaining, and assessing teaching portfolios. Selected issues with paper-based and software-based programs are compared. Key design, instructional, and procedural problems that arose during the pilot are discussed as well. The preliminary findings of this study appear to support the need for a flexible electronic portfolio system in which students play a key role in the design, development, and content of their portfolios as well as the need for a clearly articulated academic purpose and requirements for the teaching portfolio.

Citation

Smith, S. (2007). Transitioning From Paper-Based to Electronic Teaching Portfolios: Student Perceptions and Recommendations. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2007--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 180-182). San Antonio, Texas, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 17, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Barrett, H. (1998). Strategic questions: what to consider when planning for electronic portfolios. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26(2), 6.
  2. Farmer, L.S.J. (1997). Tools for electronic portfolios. Technology Connection, 4(7), 30.
  3. Guillaume, A., and Yopp, H. (1995) Professional portfolios for student teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 22(1), 93-101.
  4. Lyons, N. (1998). Introduction. In N. Lyons (Ed.), With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism (pp. 1-8).
  5. Shulman, L. (1998). Teacher portfolios: A theoretical act. In N. Lyons (Ed.), With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism (pp. 23-37). New York: Teachers College Press.
  6. Williams, S.C., Davis, M.L., Metcalf, D., & Covington, V.M. (2003). The evolution of a process portfolio as an assessment system in a teacher education program. Current Issues in Education [On-line], 6(1). Retrieved July 27, 2006, from http://cie.asu.edu/volume6/number1/
  7. Wolf, K. (1991). The schoolteacher’s portfolio: Issues in design, implementation, and evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(2), 129136.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.