Toward Technology Integration in Mathematics Education: A TechnologyIntegration Course Planning Assignment
Article
Gladis Kersaint, University of South Florida, United States
CITE Journal Volume 7, Number 4, ISSN 15285804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
This article describes a technology integration course planning assignment that was developed to enhance preservice teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). This assignment required preservice teachers work with peers to integrate various technological tools (e.g., graphing calculators, webbased mathematics applets, etc) in a secondary level mathematics course (e.g., Algebra 2). A description of the context and the course in which this assignment is given is provided and lessons learned from several years of implementation are discussed.
Citation
Kersaint, G. (2007). Toward Technology Integration in Mathematics Education: A TechnologyIntegration Course Planning Assignment. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(4), 256278. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved December 6, 2022 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/24479/.
© 2007 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map Adams, T.L. (1997). Addressing students’ difficulties with the concept of function; Applying graphing calculators and a models of conceptual change. Focus on the Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19, 4357.
 Clements, D., & Battista, M. (1994). Computer environments for learning geometry. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10(2), 173197.
 Conference Board of Mathematical Sciences. (2001). The mathematics education of teachers. Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society& Mathematics Association of America.
 Doerr, H.M., & Zangor, R. (2000). Creating meaning for and with the graphing calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 143163.
 Farrell, A.M. (1996). Roles and behaviors in technology integrated precalculus classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Behavior, 15, 3553.
 Garafalo, J., Drier, H.S., Harper, S., & Timmerman, M.A. (2000). Promoting appropriate uses of technology in mathematics teacher preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol1/iss1/currentissues/mathematics/article1.htm
 Guerrero, S., Walker, N., & Dugdale, S. (2004). Technology in support of middle grades mathematics: What have we learned? Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 23(1), 520.
 Hazzan, O. (2000). Attitudes of prospective high school mathematics teachers toward technology integrating information technologies into their future teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED444539.)
 Heller, J.I., Curtis, D.A., Jaffe, R., & Verboncoeur, C.J. (2005). The impact of handheld graphing calculator use on student achievement in Algebra 1. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED493688.)
 Hembree, R., & Dessart, D. (1992). Research on calculator in mathematics education. In J.T. Fey & C.R. Hirsch (Eds.), Calculators in mathematics education: 1992 yearbook (pp. 2332). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
 Hollar, J.C., & Norwood, K. (1999). The effects of a graphingapproach intermediate algebra curriculum on students’ understanding of function. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 220226.
 Huang, S.Y., & Waxman, H.C. (1996). Classroom observations of middle school students’ technology use in mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 96(10), 2834
 International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). National educational technology standards for student (2nd ed.). Eugene, OR: Author.
 International Society for Technology in Education. (2002). National educational technology standards for teachers. Eugene, OR: Author.
 Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 525556). New York: MacMillan.
 Kellogg, M., & Kersaint, G. (2004). Creating a vision for the Standards using online videos in an elementary mathematics methods course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher, Education, 4(1). Retrieved October 14, 2007, from http://www.citejournal.org/vol4/iss1/mathematics/article1.cfm
 Kersaint, G., Horton, B., Stohl, H., & Garofalo, J. (2003). Technology beliefs and practices of mathematics education faculty. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(4), 567595.
 Kwon, O.N. (2002). The effect of calculatorbased ranger activities on students’ graphing ability. School Science and Mathematics, 102(2), 5767.
 Lawrenz, F., Gravelu, A., & Ooms, A. (2006). Perceived helpfulness and the amount of technology in science and mathematics classes at different grade levels. School Science and Mathematics, 106, 133139.
 Mathematics Association of America. (1991). A call for change: Recommendations for the preparation of teachers of mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
 Mathematics Sciences Education Board. (1991). Counting on you: Actions supporting mathematics teaching standards. Washington, DC: Author.
 Meel, D.E. (1997). Calculatoravailable assessments: The why, what and how. Educational Assessments, 4(3), 149174.
 Merriweather, M., & Tharp, M.L. (1999). The effects of instruction with graphing calculators on how general mathematics students naturalistically solve algebraic problems. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18(1), 722.
 Milou, E. (1999). The graphing calculator: A survey of classroom usage. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 133140.
 Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Press, 108, 10171054.
 National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Teachers’ tools for the 21st century: A report of teachers’ use of technology. Retrieved on May 1, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2000102
 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
 Norton, S., McRobbie, C.J., & Cooper, T.J. (2000). Exploring secondary mathematics teachers’ reasons for not using computer in their teaching: Five case studies. Journal of research on Computing in Education, 33(1), 87109.
 Quesada, A.R., & Maxwell, M.E. (1994). The effects of using graphing calculators to enhance college students’ performance in precalculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(2), 205215.
 Roberts, D.L., & Stephens, L.J. (1999). The effects of the frequency of usage of computer software in high school geometry. Journal of Computer in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18(1), 2380.
 Rochowicz, J.A., Jr. (1996). The impact of using computers and calculators on calculus instruction. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 15, 423435.
 Simonson, L.M., & Dick, T.P. (1997). Teachers’ perceptions of the impact of graphing calculators in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(2), 239268.
 Slavit, J. (1996). Graphing calculators in a “hybrid” algebra II classroom. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(1), 914.
 U.S. Department of Education (2001). The Nation’s Report Card: Mathematics 2000. Education Statistics Quarterly, 3(3). Retrieved October 17, 2007, from the National Center for Education Statistics Website: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_3/3_3/q21.asp
 Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map
Teaching and Learning with Smart Board Technology in the Elementary Classroom
James Oigara, Canisius College, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2017 (Mar 05, 2017) pp. 896–899

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Preservice Teachers’ Perception and Beliefs in Mathematics
ChengYao Lin, Southern Illinois University, United States; YuChun Kuo, Jackson State University, United States; YiYin Ko, Indiana State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (Mar 17, 2014) pp. 1422–1431

Emergent Public Spaces: Generative Activities on Function Interpolation
Guadalupe Carmona, The University of Texas at Austin, United States; Angeles Dominguez, Instituto Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico; Gladys Krause & Pablo Duran, The University of Texas at Austin, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 11, No. 4 (December 2011) pp. 362–381

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): A Content Analysis of 20062009 Print Journal Articles
Mario Kelly, Hunter College, City University of New York, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (Mar 29, 2010) pp. 3880–3888

The decisionmaking processes of preservice teachers as they integrate technology
Charles R. Graham, Nicolette Burgoyne & Jered Borup, Brigham Young University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (Mar 29, 2010) pp. 3826–3832
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.