You are here:

A Study of Educational Simulations Part II – Interface Design

, , , , , , , University of Colorado, United States

Journal of Interactive Learning Research Volume 19, Number 4, ISSN 1093-023X Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC


Interactive computer simulations with complex representations and sophisticated graphics are a relatively new addition to the classroom, and research in this area is limited. We have conducted over 200 individual student interviews during which the students described what they were thinking as they interacted with simulations. These interviews were conducted as part of the research and design of simulations for the Physics Education Technology (PhET) project. PhET is an ongoing project that has developed over 60 simulations for use in teaching physics, chemistry, and physical science. These interviews are a rich source of information about how students interact with computer simulations and what makes an educationally effective simulation. The interviews demonstrate that the simulation must function intuitively or the student's attention is focused on how to use the simulation rather than on the topic presented. Here we provide guidelines for intuitive interface design developed by this research. These cover layout, tool use, help, and representations that we use to create a simulation. We give examples from interviews, which demonstrate the effectiveness of each guideline for engaging students in educationally productive interactions.


Adams, W.K., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., McKagan, S., Perkins, K., Dubson, M. & Wieman, C.E. (2008). A Study of Educational Simulations Part II – Interface Design. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(4), 551-577. Waynesville, NC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 15, 2018 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Adams, W.K., Perkins, K.K., & Wieman, C.E. (2006). PhET look and feel. Retrieved November 23, 2006,
  2. Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
  3. Clark, C., & Mayer, R. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction (pp 111-129). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
  4. Viadero, D. (2007). Computer animation being used to bring science concepts to life: Evidence of learning gains remains sparse. Education Week, 26, 12.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Engineering Design as Integration for High School Physics Learning: An Alternative Instructional Model

    shaobo huang, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology; Joel Mejia, Freshman Engineering Department, West Virginia University; Kurt Becker & Andrew Neilson

    Journal of STEM Education Vol. 16, No. 1 (Jun 12, 2015)

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact