Login or register for free to remove ads.
You are here:

Blended Learning in Teacher Education: An Investigation Across Media Article

, University of Florida, United States ; , University of South Carolina, United States

CITE Journal Volume 8, Number 2, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)


The development of community in educational settings is now recognized as a social and collaborative process that is an integral part of learning. As classrooms and communities extend beyond the traditional four walls, research related to online community development across media is of vital importance to teachers. The study reported in this paper furthers the research on the development of community by investigating how graduate student foreign language teachers develop and perceive community and how these perceptions or developments differ according to medium (chat, discussion board, or face-to-face class discussions). Additionally, it extends the research by bringing the cross-institutional element to the blended learning courses. The goal of the study is to explore and analyze the incorporation of technological tools into blended learning in order to assist other teachers in the creation of collaborative cross-institutional situations. Experience in these situations will assist instructors in modeling such communities for their students so that they will potentially benefit from a well-developed and well-understood sense of community, both with onsite peers and with peers at a distance.


Lord, G. & Lomicka, L. (2008). Blended Learning in Teacher Education: An Investigation Across Media. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 158-174. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 19, 2017 from .



  1. Arnold, N., & Ducate, L. (2006). Future foreign language teachers’ social and cognitive collaboration in an online environment. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 42-66. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num1/pdf/arnoldducate.pdf
  2. Arnold, N., Ducate, L., & Lomicka, L. (2007). Virtual communities of practice in teacher education. In M. Kassen, R. Lavine, K. Murphy-Judy, & M. Peters (Eds.), Preparing and developing technology-proficient L2 Teachers [CALICO Monograph Series]. San Marcos, TX: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium.
  3. Arnold, N., Ducate, L., Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2005). Using computer-mediated communication to establish social and supportive environments in teacher education. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 537-566.
  4. Baxter-Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Baym, N. K. (1995). The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), CyberSociety: Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 138-163). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  6. Belenky, M., Clinchy, B. Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.
  7. Brown, R. (2001). The process of community building in distance-learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 18-35.
  8. Bruffee, K. A. (1993). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  9. Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 4-36.
  10. Ertmer, P. A., & Stepich, D. A. (2005). Relationship between sense of community and learning in online learning environments. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for the Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 391-397). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing Education.
  11. Glisan, E., & Trainin, G. (2006). Online community and connectedness: A pilot study. Retrieved March 31, 2008, from the Digital Commons @ University of Nebraska – Lincoln Web site: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsgpirw/7.
  12. Gunwardena, C., & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26.
  13. Hall, J.K. (2001). Methods for teaching foreign languages. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  14. Kumari, D. S. (2001). Connecting graduate students to virtual guests through asynchronous discussions: analysis of an experience. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 53-63.
  15. Larson, B.E., & Keiper, T.A. (2002). Classroom discussion and threaded electronic discussion: Learning in two arenas. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol2/iss1/socialstudies/article1.cfm
  16. Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2007). Social presence in virtual communities of foreign language (FL) teachers. System, 35(2), 208-228.
  17. Lord, G., & Lomicka, L. (2004). Using collaborative cyber communities to prepare tomorrow’s teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 37(3), 401-416.
  18. McMillan, D. W. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 315-325.
  19. McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
  20. Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (1996). Dimensions of effective interactive learning with telematics for distance education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(4), 45-56.
  21. Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  22. Picciano, A. G. (1998). Developing an asynchronous course model at a large urban university. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1), 1-14.
  23. Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 2140.
  24. Reid, E. (1995). Virtual worlds: Culture and imagination. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), CyberSociety: Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 164-183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  25. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  26. Rovai, A. P. (2001). Building classroom community at a distance: A case study. Education Technology and Research Development, 49(4), 33-48.
  27. Rovai, A. P. (2002a). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. The Internet and Higher Education, 5, 197-211.
  28. Rovai, A. P. (2002b). A Preliminary look at the structural differences of higher education: Classroom communities in traditional and ALN courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 41-56.
  29. Rovai, A. P. (2002c). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319-332.
  30. Rovai, A. P., & Barnum, K. T. (2003). On-line course effectiveness: An analysis of student interactions and perceptions of learning. Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 57-73.
  31. Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/192/274
  32. Rovai, A. P., & Lucking, R. A. (2000, September). Measuring sense of classroom community. Paper presented at Learning 2000: Reassessing the Virtual University, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA.
  33. Russell, M., & Ginsburg, L. (1999). Learning online: Extending the meaning of community: A review of three programs from the southeastern United States. Philadelphia: National Center on Adult Literacy, University of Pennsylvania.
  34. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
  35. Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115-136.
  36. Thorne, S. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication, Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38-67.
  37. Tu, C-H. (2000). Strategies to increase interaction in online social learning environments. Paper presented at the 11th international conference of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 444 550).

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.