You are here:

Face-to-Face versus Online Coursework: A Comparison of Learning Outcomes and Costs
Article

, , Bowling Green State University, United States

CITE Journal Volume 7, Number 4, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

This study documents the transformation of a graduate-level course for teachers that had traditionally been taught in a face-to-face (f2f) model, in multiple sections, at a large university. By designing the course for online delivery and developing various interactive multimedia modules, the university was able to offer the course at a considerable savings while maintaining quality. The faculty worked in close collaboration, strategizing creative solutions to maintain the academic rigor and integrity of the course. Student papers and projects were analyzed and compared from both the f2f and online versions of the course to determine academic quality and learning outcomes.

Citation

Herman, T. & Banister, S. (2007). Face-to-Face versus Online Coursework: A Comparison of Learning Outcomes and Costs. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(4), 318-326. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved January 30, 2023 from .

© 2007 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Baumgartner, E., Bell, P., Brophy, S., Hoadley, C., Hsi, S., Joseph, D., et al. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
  2. Bloom B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.
  3. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
  4. Kearsley, G. (2000). Online education: Learning and teaching in cyberspace. Toronto: Wadsworth.
  5. MacKinnon, G.R., & Aylward, L. (1999). Six steps to improving the quality of your electronic discussion groups. Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, 13(4), 17-19.
  6. Presby, L. (2001). Seven tips for highly effective online courses. Syllabus, 17.
  7. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2003). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  8. Stacey, E., & Rice, M. (2002). Evaluating an online learning environment. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 323-340.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links