Login or register for free to remove ads.
You are here:

Designing Multimedia Case-Based Instruction Accommodating Students’ Diverse Learning Styles Article

, , , The University of Georgia, United States

Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia Volume 17, Number 1, ISSN 1055-8896 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

Although many benefits of case-based instruction with multimedia have been reported, there are few empirical studies of how the benefits of multimedia case-based instructions (MCBIs) are mediated by students' individual differences, such as their learning styles. Understanding the relationships between students' learning styles and the learning benefits of MCBIs is important not only for the effective design of case instructions, but also for their appropriate use. The purpose of this study is to investigate how students' learning styles (sensing-intuitive, sequential-global, active-reflective, and visual-verbal dimensions) interact with the students' perceived benefits from the MCBI lesson in order to redesign the MCBI that accommodates students' diverse learning styles. Fifty-seven fourth-year students in a dental school participated in this study. The students were given a one-hour long lesson of MCBI for anesthesiology through the Internet. Then, students' learning styles and their learning experience with the instruction were collected through the Internet. The results of a multiple regression analysis revealed that sensing, sequential, and reflective learners tended to have a more meaningful learning experience with the given MCBI lesson compared with intuitive, global, and active learners. The implications for the design of MCBI and the recommendations for further studies are discussed.

Citation

Choi, I., Lee, S.J. & Jung, J.W. (2008). Designing Multimedia Case-Based Instruction Accommodating Students’ Diverse Learning Styles. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(1), 5-25. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 19, 2017 from .

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, L., Kasserman, J., Yearwood, A., Perfetto, G., Brandsford, J., & Franks, J. (1988). The effects of facts versus problem-oriented acquisition. Memory & Cognition, 16(2), 167-175.
  2. Baldwin, L., & Sabry, K. (2003). Learning styles for interactive learning systems. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(4), 325-340.
  3. Carlson, J. A., & Schodt, D. W. (1995). Beyond the lecture: Case teaching and the learning of economic theory. Journal of Economic Education, 26(1), 1728.
  4. Carlson, H. L, & Falk, D. R. (1989). Effective use of interactive videodisc instruction in understanding and implementing cooperative group learning with elementary pupils in social studies and social education. Theory and Research in Social Education, 17(3), 241-258.
  5. Carter, K., & Unklesbay, R. (1989). Cases in teaching and law. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(6), 527-536.
  6. Choi, I., Kim, H., Jung, J., Clinton, G., & Kang, J. (2006). A case-based e-learning model for professional education: Anesthesiology for dental students. In
  7. Book 2006 (Vol. 27, pp 109-118). Englewood, Co: Libraries Unlimited. Book 2006
  8. Christensen, C. R. (1987). Teaching with the case method. Boston: Harvard Business School.
  9. Cliff, W. H., & Wright, A. W. (1996). Directed case study method for teaching human anatomy and physiology. Advanced in Physiology Education, 15(1), S19-S28.
  10. Entwistle, N. J. (1979). Motivation, styles of learning and the academic environment. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED190636)
  11. Ertmer, P. A., & Russell, J. D. (1995). Using case studies to enhance instructional design education. Educational Technology, 35(4), 23-31.
  12. Felder, R. M. (2002, June). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education: Author’s preface. Retrieved June 13, 2005, from http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/LS-1988.pdf
  13. Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
  14. Felder, R. M., & Soloman, B. A. (1991/1994a). Index of learning styles. Retrieved June 13, 2005, from http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ILSpage. Html
  15. Felder, R. M., & Soloman, B. A. (1991/1994b). Learning styles and strategies. Retrieved June 11, 2005, from http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ILSdir/styles.htm
  16. Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability, and validity of the index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 103-112.
  17. Jarz, E. M., Kainz, G. A., & Walpoth, G. (1997). Multimedia-based case studies in education: Design, development, and evaluation of multimedia-based
  18. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and illstructured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(1), 65-94.
  19. Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  20. Keefe, J. W. (1987). Learning style theory and practice. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
  21. Kolb, D. A. (1976). Learning style inventory: Technical manual. Boston: McBer. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  22. Lockhart, R. S., Lamon, M., & Gick, M. L. (1988). Conceptual transfer in simple insight problems. Memory & Cognition, 16(1), 36-44.
  23. Lovelace, M. K. (2005). Meta-analysis of experimental research based on the Dunn and Dunn model. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 176183.
  24. Mayer, R. E., & Massa, L. J. (2003). Three facets of visual and verbal learners: Cognitive ability, cognitive style, and learning preference. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 833-846.
  25. McNamara, T. P., Miller, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1991). Mental models and reading comprehension. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume II (pp. 490-511). Handbook of reading research: Volume II (pp. 490-511). Handbook of reading research: Volume II White Plains, NY: Longman.
  26. Merseth, K. K. (1991). The early history of case-based instruction: Insights for teacher education today. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 243-249. Parkhurst, P. E., Lovell, K. L., Sprafka, S. A., & Hodgins, M. W. (1972). Evaluation of videodisc modules: A mixed methods approach. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED348014)
  27. Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 25-36.
  28. Riding, R. J., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies. London: David Fulton.
  29. Sadler-Smith, E. (1997). “Learning style”: Frameworks and instruments. Educational Psychology, 17(1-2), 51-63.
  30. Shyu, H. C. (2000). Using video-based anchored instruction to enhance learning: Taiwan’s experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 5769.
  31. Specht, L. B., & Sandlin, P. K. (1991). The differential effects of experiential learning activities and traditional lecture classes in accounting. Simulation and Gaming, 22(2), 196-210.
  32. Stepich, D. A., Ertmer, P. A., & Lane, M. M. (2001). Problem-solving in a casebased course: Strategies for facilitating coached expertise. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(3), 53-67.
  33. Stone, H. R. (1988). Variations in characteristics and performance between on-campus and video-based off-campus engineering graduate students. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 36(1), 18-23.
  34. Tuckman, B.W. (1999). Conducting educational research (5th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
  35. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education. New York: MacMillan.
  36. Williams, S. M. (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(4), 367-427.
  37. Winkler, J. D., & Polich, J. M. (1990). Effectiveness of interactive videodisc in Army communication training. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED337144)

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.