References

1. Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2006, November). Making the grade: Online education in the United States. Sloan Consortium and Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved http://www.sloan-C.org/publications/survey/index.asp
2. Anderson, T.D., & Garrison, D.R. (1998). Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. In C.C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education (pp. 97-112).
3. Biner, P.M., Bink, M.L., Huffman, M.L., & Dean, R.S. (1995). Personality characteristics differentiating and predicting the achievement of televised-course students and traditional-course students. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 46-60.
4. Brown, J.S. (2000). Growing up digital: How the Web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. Retrieved July 27, 2007, from http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/FEB02_Issue/article01.html
5. Cheurprakobkit, S., Hale, D.F., & Olson, J.N. (2002). Technicians' perceptions about Web-based courses: The University of Texas system experience. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 245-258.
6. Comeaux, P., Huber, R., Kasprzak, J., & Nixon, M.A. (1998). Collaborative learning in Web-based instruction. Paper presented at the 3rd WebNet 98 World Conference on the WWW, Internet, and Intranet, Orlando, FL.
7. Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Dille, B., & Mezack, M. (1991). Identifying predictors of high risk among community college telecourse students. The American Journal of Distance Education, 2(1), 25-37.
9. Fjortoff, N.F. (1995, October). Predicting persistence in distance learning programs. Paper presented at the Mid-Western Educational Research Meeting, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 387 620).
10. Galusha, J.M. (1997). Barriers to learning in distance education. Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 5(3-4), 6-14.
11. Garland, M.R. (1993). Student perceptions of the situational, institutional, dispositional, and epistemological barriers to persistence. Distance Education, 14(2), 181-198.
12. Hall, B. (1997). Web-based training cookbook. New York: John Wiley& Sons, Inc.
13. Hanson, D., Maushak, N.J., Schlosser, C.A., Anderson, M.L., Sorensen, C., & Simonson, M. (1997). Distance Education: Review of the Literature (2nd ed.). Bloomington, Indiana: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
14. Khan, B.H. (2001). A framework for Web-based training. In B.H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based training(pp. 75-97). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
15. Lambert, M.P. (2000). The home study inheritance. In M.G. Moore& N. Shin (Eds.), Speaking personally about distance education foundations of contemporary practice (pp. 7-11). University Park, PA: The American Center for the Study of Distance Education
16. Lindblom-Ylanne, S., & Pihlajamaki, H. (2003). Can a collaborative network environment enhance essay-writing processes? British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 1730.
17. MacKeracher, D. (1996). Making sense of adult learning. Toronto: Culture Concepts. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3)
18. Olgren, C.H. (1998). Improving learning outcomes: The effects of learning strategies and motivation. In C.C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education (pp. 77-96).
19. Pugliese, R.R. (1994). Telecourse persistence and psychological variables. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(3), 22-39.
20. Stone, T.E. (1992). A new look at the role of locus of control in completion rates in distance education. Research in Distance Education, 4(2), 6-9.
21. Thompson, M.M. (1998). Distance learners in higher education. In C.C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education (pp. 9-24). Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
22. Williams, P.E. (2003). Roles and competencies of distance education programs in higher education institutions. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 45-57.

Cited By

• How can we design online courses that are effective for student learning? (Roundtable)

  Antoinette Marie Davis, Colorado State University-Global Campus, United States

  Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2019 (Mar 18, 2019) pp. 420–430

• Digital Media Skills That Make Online Learners Thrive and Succeed

  Myrene Magabo, University of the Philippines and University of Phoenix, United States; Faye Watson, John Garot & Kim Capeheart, University of Phoenix, United States

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2017 (Oct 17, 2017) pp. 876–897

• E-Learning: Where Do I Begin ?

  Walaiwad Chaiyabutr, Sukhothaithammathirat Open University, Thailand

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2016 (Nov 14, 2016) pp. 1313–1320

• Blended/Online Learner Orientations: Recommendations for Design

  Patricia McGee, Erin Valdes & Danica Bullis, The University of Texas at San Antonio, United States

  International Journal on E-Learning Vol. 15, No. 2 (May 2016) pp. 215–241

• Factors Influencing Teacher Satisfaction at an Online Charter School

  Jered Borup & Mark Stevens, George Mason University, United States

  Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (Mar 17, 2014) pp. 1534–1541

• The online video lecture: Examining the role of the communicator, the learner and the lecture in promoting effective learning.

  Rodney McCrohan & Tom Palaskas, RMIT University, Australia

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2013 (Oct 21, 2013) pp. 167–175

• The Effects of Contrasting Models in an Online Discussion Environment

  Heejung An, William Paterson University, United States

  Global TIME 2012 (Feb 07, 2012) pp. 246–249

• Online Learner Competencies: Results of a Worldwide Validation Study

  Barbara Grabowski, Penn State University, United States; Gila Kurtz, The Center for Academic Studies, Israel; Insung Jung, International Christian University, Japan; Michael Beaudoin, University of New England, United States; Katsuaki Suzuki, Kumamoto University, Japan

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2011 (Oct 18, 2011) pp. 1929–1935

• The impact of different instructional facilitation approaches on students' participation during an online discussion

  Heejung An, William Paterson University, United States; Sunghee Shin, Queens College CUNY, United States; Keol Lim, Teachers College, Columbia University, United States

  Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (Mar 03, 2008) pp. 204–207

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links

• HTML version at citejournal.org