You are here:

Small Group Collaboration in Peer-Led Electronic Discourse: An Analysis of Group Dynamics and Interactions Involving Preservice and Inservice Teachers
Article

, St John Fisher College, United States

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 15, Number 3, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

Although researchers and educators agree that small group collaboration is an essential part of teacher education, not much attention had been paid to examining the dynamics, characteristics, and processes of online group collaboration involving teachers in a peer-led context. Yet, understanding how online teacher learning groups evolve and what conditions facilitate or hinder learning in such an environment is important to inform teacher educators about optimal ways to organize and facilitate group learning in teacher education. The purpose of this study is to investigate group characteristics and processes that impact peer-led group discussions and the role of the group facilitators in online small group learning. Thirty-one graduate students in a teacher education literacy seminar participated in the study. The study provides a qualitative content analysis of small group collaboration and insight to support existing structures for preservice and inservice teachers' professional development.

Citation

Ikpeze, C. (2007). Small Group Collaboration in Peer-Led Electronic Discourse: An Analysis of Group Dynamics and Interactions Involving Preservice and Inservice Teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 383-407. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 25, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Holman, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15 (3), 6-11, 38-46. Dornye i, Z. (1997). Psychological processes in cooperative language learning: Group dynamics and motivation. Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 482-493.
  2. Duek, J.E. (2000). Whose group is it, anyway? Equity of student discourse in problem-based learning (PBL). In D.H. Evensen & C.E. Hmelo (Eds.) , Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 75-108). Mahwah , NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  3. Edens, K.M. (2000). Promoting communication, inquiry and reflection in an early practicum experience via an online discussion group. Action in Teacher Education, 22(2A), 14-23.
  4. Faidley, J., Evensen, D.H., Salisbury-Glennon, J., Glenn, J., & Hmelo, C.E. (2000). How are we doing? Methods of assessing group processing in a problem-based learning context. In D.H. Evensen & C.E. Hmelo (Eds.) , Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 109-135). Mahwah , NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  5. Glesne, C. (1998). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
  6. Harasim, L. (1993). Collaborating in cyberspace: Using computer conferences as a group learning environment. Interactive Learning Environment, 3(2), 119-130. Har thorn , L.G. , & Ingram, A.L. (2002). Online collaboration: Making i t work. Educational Technology, 42(1) , 33-40.
  7. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1995). Cooperative learning and nonacademic outcomes of schooling. In J.E. Pedersen& A.D. Digby (Eds.), Secondary schools and cooperative learning (pp. 81-150). New York:
  8. Lao, T., & Gonzales, C. (2005). Understanding online learning through a qualitative description of professors and students’ experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 459-474.
  9. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (2003). Changing leadership in changing times. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  10. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. MacDone l l , W. (1992). The role of the teacher in the cooperative learning classroom. In C. Kessler (Ed.) , Cooperative language learning: A teacher resource book. (pp. 163-174). Eng lewood C l iffs , NJ : Prentice
  11. McDonald, J., & Gibson, C.C. (1998). Interpersonal dynamics and group development in computer conferencing. American Journal of Distance Education, 12(1), 7-25.
  12. McLeskey, J., & Waldron, N.L. (2004). Three conceptions of teacher learning: Exploring there la t ionsh ip between knowledge and the practice of teaching. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27 (1), 3-14.
  13. Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and cases tudy applications in education. Revised and expanded from “cases tudy research in educa-t ion.” (010 Books; 050 Gu ides—Genera l). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. National Foundation for the Improvement of Education (2000). Teachers take charge of their learning. Retrieved December 20 , 2004 , from http://www.nfie.org/publications/takecharge.htm
  14. Neck, C.P., & Manz, C.C. (1994). From groupthink to teamthink: Towards the creation of constructive thought patterns in self-managing work teams. Human Relations, 47 (8), 929-952.
  15. Nicholson, S., & Bond, N. (2003). Collaborative reflection and profession-a l community building: An analysis of preservice teachers’ use of an electronic discussion board. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(2), 259-279. Ny ikos , M. , & Hashimoto, R. (1997). Constructivist theory applied to collaborative learning in teacher education: In search of ZPD. Modern Language Journal, 81 (4), 506-517.
  16. Palincsar, A.S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Reviews Psychology, 49, 345-375. Rayw id , M.A. (1993). Finding time for collaboration. Educational Leadership, 5(1) , 30-34.
  17. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Turb i l , J. (2002). The role of the facilitator in a professional learning system: The framwork project. In G. Hoban (Ed.) , Teacher learning for educational change. Philadelphia: Philadelphia University Press.
  18. Volery, T. (2001). Online education: An exploratory study into success factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(1), 77-92.
  19. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  20. Walther, J. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
  21. Wang, M., Sierra, C., & Folger, T. (2003). Building a dynamic online learning community among adult learners. Education Media In terna-Small Group Collaboration in Peer-Led Electronic Discourse 407

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Online learning in face-to-face courses: Facilitating group work and extending engagement

    Susan Zimlich, Southeastern Louisiana University, United States

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2014 (Oct 27, 2014) pp. 2154–2157

  2. Guiding Preservice Teacher Candidates to Implement Student-Centered Applications of Technology in the Classroom

    Laura Kieran & Christine Anderson, Western Illinois University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (Mar 17, 2014) pp. 2414–2421

  3. Examining Teachers’ Personal and Professional Use of Facebook: Recommendations for teacher education programming

    Trisha Steinbrecher, University of New Mexico, United States; Juliet Hart, Arizona State University, United States

    Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 20, No. 1 (January 2012) pp. 71–88

  4. Building Community: Effective Strategies to Increase Interaction in Online Learning

    Carolyn Bishop & Rebecca Hong, Biola University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 1106–1111

  5. Missed Opportunities, Misunderstandings, and Misgivings: A Case Study Analysis of Three Beginning English Teachers’ Attempts at Authentic Discussion With Adolescents in a Synchronous CMC Environment

    Susan Groenke, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, United States

    Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 18, No. 3 (July 2010) pp. 387–414

  6. Examining cognitive attributes in student-teacher and student-student online interactions

    Dorit Maor, Murdoch University, Australia

    Global Learn 2010 (May 17, 2010) pp. 4247–4252

  7. On-Line Instruction: An Opportunity to Re-examine and Re-invent Pedagogy

    Irene Rosenthal, The College of St. Rose, United States

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2009 (Oct 26, 2009) pp. 1900–1905

  8. Peer-Led Discussion: Who is the Learner and Who is the Teacher in the Online Learning Environment?

    Dorit Maor, Murdoch University, Australia

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2008 (Nov 17, 2008) pp. 2958–2963

  9. Asynchronous Communication: Review of Literature

    Trish Steinbrecher, University of Kansas, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (Mar 03, 2008) pp. 4341–4347

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.