You are here:

An Analysis of the Journey of Open and Distance Education: Major Concepts and Cutoff Points in Research Trends
ARTICLE

, , , ,

IRRODL Volume 20, Number 1, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Full Text

Abstract

In an effort to understand trends in open and distance education more comprehensively, this study aims to identify the research trends, major concepts, and cutoff points in the articles published between 2009 and 2016. From five major peer-reviewed journals, a total of 989 articles were analyzed through a systematic literature review process using content analysis. The articles were coded based on the following three categories: level, topics, and sub-topics. The results indicated the followings: (1) emerged main themes in the articles were foundations of open and distance education, instructional process, and effects of applications; (2) there was an upward growth in the publishing of the articles on massive open online courses, open educational resources, and students’ perspectives; (3) new pedagogical approaches and online learning design played a triggering role in the research topics; and (4) technological and pedagogical developments between 2011 and 2012 had an influence on the tendency of the articles. In addition, we explored cutoff points so that they may provide insights and valuable hints for researchers to design new studies in open and distance education field. Discussions about the gaps in the state-of-the-art trends and directions about future research were also included. 

Citation

ÇAKIROĞLU, Ü., KOKOÇ, M., GÖKOĞLU, S., ÖZTÜRK, M. & ERDOĞDU, F. (2019). An Analysis of the Journey of Open and Distance Education: Major Concepts and Cutoff Points in Research Trends. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved July 18, 2019 from .

© 2019 Athabasca University Press

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V.(2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2017-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdf
  2. Ariadurai, S.A., & Manohanthan, R. (2008). Instructional strategies in teaching engineering at a distance:
  3. Atkins, D.E., Brown, J.S., & Hammond, A.L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER)
  4. Bauer, L. (2003). Introducing linguistic morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  5. Berge, Z.L., & Mrozowski, S. (2001). Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 5-19. Doi:10.1080/08923640109527090
  6. Bernard, L., Paton, V., & Lan, W. (2008). Online self-regulatory learning behaviors as a mediator in the
  7. Bishop, M.J., & Elen, J. (2014). Model-based learning and performance. In J.M. Spector, M.D. Merrill,
  8. Diver, P., & Martinez, I. (2015). MOOCs as a massive research laboratory: Opportunities and challenges. Distance Education, 36(1), 5-25. Doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.1019968
  9. Giannakos, M.N. (2013). Exploring the video‐based learning research: A review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 191-195.
  10. Hodder, I. (1994). The interpretation of documents and material culture. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  11. Johnson, L., Laurence, F., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). The 2010 horizon report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from https://www.nmc.org/pdf/2010-HorizonReport.pdf
  12. Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
  13. Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Hatala, M. (2015). What public media reveals
  14. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2007). Mobile usability in educational contexts: What have we learnt? The
  15. Luschei, T.F., Dimyati, S., & Padmo, D. (2008). Maintaining e3‐learning while transitioning to online instruction: The case of the Open University of Indonesia. Distance Education, 29(2), 165-174.
  16. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley& Sons.
  17. Russell, G. (2006). Online and virtual schooling in Europe. European Journal of Open, Distance and Elearning, 9(1). 1-7. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Glenn_Russell.pdf
  18. Sherry, L. (1996). Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(4), 337-365. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/8937/
  19. Shih, M., Feng, J., & Tsai, C.C. (2008). Research and trends in the field of e-learning from 2001 to 2005: A content analysis of cognitive studies in selected journals. Computers& Education, 51(2), 955967.
  20. Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82-83. Retrieved from http://www.msuedtechsandbox.com/MAETELy22015/wpcontent/uploads/2015/07/the_flipped_classroom_article_2.pdf
  21. Zawacki-Richter, O., & Naidu, S. (2016). Mapping research trends from 35 years of publications in Distance Education. Distance Education, 37(3), 245-269.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References