You are here:

Developing and Managing a Cohort-Based Doctoral Program in Educational Technology Leadership
PROCEEDING

, , , , New Jersey City University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-37-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

There are challenges and rewards in developing and managing a successful cohort-based doctoral degree program in Educational Technology Leadership. Emerging digital networks, powerful platforms, on-line learners, and focused instructors fused together to create an exciting and innovative instructional force in higher education, namely a cohort. From online discussions to papers, onsite and offsite activities, and a plethora of collaborative and innovative projects, the benefits and rewards within this educational technology leadership program initiate the enthusiasm, richness, validity, and bonding of professionals as change agents undertaking challenges and risks under an umbrella and unity as a community of practice.

Citation

Zieger, L., Brown, D., Bensetti-Benbader, H. & Munn, C. (2019). Developing and Managing a Cohort-Based Doctoral Program in Educational Technology Leadership. In K. Graziano (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 895-898). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 28, 2022 from .

© 2019 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, Social Media& Technology 2018. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
  2. Fox, S., Rainie, L. (2014). Part 1: How the internet has woven itself into American life. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/27/part-1-how-the-internet-has-woven-itself-into-american-life/
  3. Granic, I., Lobel, A., & Engels, R.C. (2014). The benefits of playing videogames. American Psychologist, 69(1), 66. Retrieved from https://ecirtam.net/autoblogs/autoblogs/wwwpsyetgeekcom_b5b05cdb291029679998f4bbf13bf6d0c1b27186/media/affa8d7f.amp-a0034857.pdf
  4. Hartley, A.J. (2014). Perceived barriers to technology integration. Retrieved from https://commons.emich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? referer= https://scholar.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=2198&context=theses
  5. Johnson, A.M., Jacovina, M.E., Russell, D.G., & Soto, C.M. (2016). Challenges and solutions when using technologies in the classroom. In Adaptive Educational Technologies for Literacy Instruction(pp. 13-30). Routledge.
  6. Merrill, S. (2009). Did You Know? Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2009/03/25/did-you-know/
  7. Northouse, P.G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and practice. (6th ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  8. Pew Research Center. (2014). “The Web at 25.” Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/25/the-web-at-25-in-the-u-s
  9. Riedo F., Rétornaz P., Bergeron L., Nyffeler N., & Mondada F. (2012). A two years informal learning experience using the thymio robot. Advances in Autonomous Mini Robots. Retrieved from
  10. The Nielsen Company (2017). Nielsen Games 360 Report. Retrieved from https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2017/us-games-360-report-2017.html
  11. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  12. Wenger, E., Smith, J.D., & White, N. (2009). Digital Habitats: Stewarding technology for communities. Portland, Or.: CPsquare.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read