You are here:

"Awareness for Review Chance" Framework for Knowledge Stability of Usage of Words and Phrases
PROCEEDINGS

, , Tokushima University, Japan ; , Kinki University, Japan ; , Kochi University, Japan ; , Tokushima University, Japan

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Montreal, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-56-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

We had developed illustrative-sentences search tool using phrase structure. This tool can search examples from query that consists of phrases and/or words and adduce the classified examples to the user. The user does learning activity as s/he solves realistic problems of vocabulary when s/he writes with English. But easy search reduces learning activity cognition of the user because s/he can reexamine the usage of words and phrases too easily and does not need to remember it. Therefore knowledge of usage of words and phrases is not stabilized to the user strongly. What is important for knowledge stability is to review the usage of words and phrases s/he searched. In this paper, we propose the framework that supports review chance awareness for knowledge stability of usage of words and phrases. Our proposed framework generates new queries from search logs of interest to the user and searches new examples from the web with the queries. The purpose of this framework is to give notice of review chance to the user by e-mail and/or RSS at appropriate good timing.

Citation

Miyoshi, Y., Kanenishi, K., Ochi, Y., Okamoto, R. & Yano, Y. (2005). "Awareness for Review Chance" Framework for Knowledge Stability of Usage of Words and Phrases. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2005--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 3998-4003). Montreal, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved May 22, 2022 from .

© 2005 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Kaneko, S., Fujita, N., Ugawa, Y., Kawamoto, T., Takeuchi, H., Takekoshi, M., and Ohtake, H. (2002) A Dictionary System that Helps Scientific Writing in English. Proceedings of JSiSE2002, Japanese Society for Information and Systems in Education, pp. 265-266.
  2. Marcus, M., Kim G., Marcinkiewicz, M., MacIntyre, R., Bies, A., Ferguson, M., Katz, K., and Schasberger, B. (1994) The Penn Treebank: Annotating predicate argument structure. In ARPA Human Language Technology Workshop, ftp://ftp.cis.upenn.edu/pub/treebank/doc/arpa94.ps.gz
  3. Sekine, S., and Grishman, R. (1997) Apple Pie Parser ver.5.9, http://www.cs.nyu.edu/cs/projects/proteus/app/
  4. Someya, Y. (1999). The State of Written Business Communication in English in the Japanese Workplace: A Questionnaire Survey, The 64t h Annual Convention of the Association for Business Communication.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References