You are here:

Pomp and circumstance: University presidents and the role of human capital in determining who leads U.S. research institutions
ARTICLE

,

Economics of Education Review Volume 32, Number 1, ISSN 0272-7757 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

Abstract

While there is wide agreement that leaders matter, little is known regarding the role that human capital plays in determining who becomes one. We exploit unique attributes of the higher education industry to examine if training and academic ability affect the placement of university presidents within the research hierarchy of U.S. institutions. The analysis uses two data sets drawn from the American College President Survey conducted over three decades and a digitized sample of 212 curriculum vitae for presidents at top U.S. universities in 2009, to model the factors that determine who among the pool of university presidents places at Carnegie-classified research institutions. The findings suggest the rise to the presidency of a research institution depends on the investments in research-specific human capital over the entire course of a career consistent with prior evidence that the knowledge of the research enterprise is critical to the success of such institutions.

Citation

Singell, L.D. & Tang, H.H. (2013). Pomp and circumstance: University presidents and the role of human capital in determining who leads U.S. research institutions. Economics of Education Review, 32(1), 219-233. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved June 6, 2023 from .

This record was imported from Economics of Education Review on March 1, 2019. Economics of Education Review is a publication of Elsevier.

Full text is availabe on Science Direct: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.10.005

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Avery, C., Glickman, M., Hoxby, C., & Metrick, A. (2004). A revealed preference ranking of U.S. colleges and universities, NBER Working Paper No. W10803.
  2. Caligiuri, P., & Tarique, I. (2009). Predicting effectiveness in global leadership activities. Journal of World Business, 44, pp. 336-346.
  3. Coates, D., & Humphreys, B.R. (2002). The supply of university enrollments: University administrators as utility maximizing bureaucrats. Public Choice, 110(3–4), pp. 365-392.
  4. Cornell, B. (2004). Compensation and recruiting: Private universities versus private corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(1), pp. 37-52.
  5. Cunningham, B.M. (2009). Faculty: Thy administrator's keeper? Some evidence. Economics of Education Review, 28(4), pp. 444-453.
  6. Dasgupta, A., & Sarafidis, Y. (2009). Managers as administrators: Reputation and incentives. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70(1–2), pp. 155-163.
  7. Dreher, A., Lamla, M.J., Lein, S.M., & Somogyi, F. (2009). The impact of political leaders’ profession and education on reforms. Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, 37(1), pp. 169-193.
  8. Ehrenberg, R. G. (2002). Studying ourselves: The academic labor market, NBER Working Papers 8965.
  9. Ehrenberg, R.G., Cheslock, J., & Epifantseva, J. (2001). Paying our presidents: What do trustees value?. Review of Higher Education, 25(1), pp. 15-37.
  10. Ehrenberg, R.G., Jakubson, G.H., Martin, M.L., Main, J.B., & Eisenberg, T. (2012). Diversifying the faculty across gender lines: Do trustees and administrators matter?. Economics of Education Review, 31(1), pp. 9-18.
  11. Goodall, A.H. (2006). Should top universities be led by top researchers and are they? A citations analysis. Journal of Documentation, 62(3), pp. 388-411.
  12. Goodall, A.H. (2009). Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities. Research Policy, 38(7), pp. 1079-1092.
  13. Jones, B.F., & Olken, B.A. (2005). Do leaders matter? National leadership and growth since World War II. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), pp. 835-864.
  14. Kolpin, V., & Singell, L.D. (1997). Asymmetric information, strategic behavior and discrimination in the labor market. Economic Theory, 10(1), pp. 175-184.
  15. Kuhn, P., & Weinberger, C. (2005). Leadership skills and wages. Journal of Labor Economics, 23, pp. 395-436.
  16. McCormick, A.C., & Zhao, C.-M. (2005). Rethinking and reframing the Carnegie classification. Change.
  17. McDowell, J., Singell, L.D., & Stater, M. (2009). Congratulations or condolences? The role of human capital in the cultivation of a university administrator. Economics of Education Review, 28(2), pp. 258-267.
  18. McDowell, J., Singell, L.D., & Stater, M. (2011). On (and off) the hot seat: An analysis of the entry into and out of university administration. Industrial Labor Relations Review, 64(October (5)), pp. 889-909.
  19. McDowell, J.M., Singell, L.D., & Ziliak, J.P. (2001). Gender and promotion in the economics profession. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(2), pp. 224-244.
  20. McFarlin, C., & Ebbers, L. (1998). Preparation factors common in outstanding community college presidents. Michigan Community College Journal: Research and Practice, 4(1), pp. 33-47.
  21. Mixon, F.G., & Kenzie, R.W. (1999). Managerial tenure under private and government ownership: The case of higher education. Economics of Education Review, 18(1), pp. 51-58.
  22. Monks, J. (2007). Public versus private university presidents pay levels and structure. Economics of Education Review, 26(3), pp. 338-348.
  23. Monks, J., & McGoldrick, K.M. (2004). Gender earnings differentials among college administrators. Industrial Relations, 43(4), pp. 742-758.
  24. Monks, J., & Robinson, M. (2000). Gender and racial earnings differentials in academic labor markets. Economic Inquiry, 38(4), pp. 662-671.
  25. Moore, W.J., Newman, R.J., & Turnbull, G.K. (2003). Internal markets for department chairs: Comparative advantage, life-cycle, and jury duty. Journal of Labor Research, 24(4), pp. 669-682.
  26. O’Connell, J.F. (2005). Administrative compensation in private nonprofits: The case of liberal arts colleges. Quarterly Journal of Business & Economics, 44(1), pp. 1-12.
  27. Oswald, A.J. (2006). An examination of the reliability of prestigious scholarly journals: Evidence and implications for decision-makers. Economica, 74(1), pp. 21-31.
  28. Pfeffer, J., & Davis-Blake, A. (1992). Salary dispersion, location in the salary distribution, and turnover among college administrator. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, pp. 753-763.
  29. Pfeffer, J., & Ross, J. (1988). The compensation of college and university presidents. Research in Higher Education, 29(1), pp. 79-91.
  30. Rothschild, M., & White, L.J. (1993). The university in the marketplace: Some insights and some puzzles. Studies of supply and demand in higher education Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  31. Sala, F. (2003). Leadership in education: Effective U.K. college principals. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14(2), pp. 171-189.
  32. Sammons, P., Hillman, J., & Mortimore, P.K. (1995). Characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research. London: OFSTED.
  33. Siegfried, J.J. (1997). Should economists be kicked upstairs?. Southern Economic Journal, 63(4), pp. 853-871.
  34. Singell, L.D. (1991). Baseball-specific human capital: Why good but not great players coach in the major leagues. Southern Economic Journal, 58, pp. 77-86.
  35. Tang, T.L., & Tang, T.L. (1996). Pay differentials revisited: CEOs and the five highest paid employees at private colleges and universities.
  36. Vroom, V.H. (2007). Can leaders learn to lead, leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations. Can leaders learn to lead, leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
  37. Webster, T.J. (2001). A principal component analysis of the U.S. News & World Report tier rankings of colleges and universities. Economics of Education Review, 20(3), pp. 235-244.
  38. Wessel, R.D., & Keim, M.C. (1994). Career patterns of private four-year college and university presidents in the United States. Journal of Higher Education, 65(2), pp. 211-225.
  39. Zogbi, C. (2003). Why have public university presidents done so badly?. Economics of Education Review, 22(1), pp. 45-57.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References