You are here:

One year of preschool or two: Is it important for adult outcomes?

, Truman School of Public Affairs, University of Missouri, United States ; , Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. ; , Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, United States ; , Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, United States

Economics of Education Review Volume 40, Number 1, ISSN 0272-7757 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd


Until recently, public funding for preschool education had been growing rapidly over a decade with most state programs providing one year of preschool for four year olds. Fewer three year olds are enrolled in preschool. To investigate the importance of enrollment duration, this study is the first to estimate long-term dosage effects of years of preschool. We use data from a cohort of 1500 students in the Chicago Longitudinal Study who enrolled in the Chicago Public Schools in the mid-1980s. Many of these students participated in a high-quality preschool program called Child-Parent Centers (CPC) for one or two years. To address selection with multiple treatments, we employ inverse propensity score weighting. Relative to children who attended one year of CPC preschool, the two-year group is significantly less likely to receive special education or be abused or neglected or to commit crimes. The findings provide support for the long-term benefits of greater exposure to preschool.


Arteaga, I., Humpage, S., Reynolds, A.J. & Temple, J.A. (2014). One year of preschool or two: Is it important for adult outcomes?. Economics of Education Review, 40(1), 221-237. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved July 22, 2019 from .

This record was imported from Economics of Education Review on March 1, 2019. Economics of Education Review is a publication of Elsevier.

Full text is availabe on Science Direct:



View References & Citations Map

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References