Results of an Experiment Evaluating the Use of Video Cases to Help Pre-Service Teachers Become Better Teachers of Literacy PROCEEDINGS
Michael M. Phillips, Matthew J. Koehler, Gaoming Zhang, Aman Yadav, Cheryl Rosaen, Michigan State University, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Montreal, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-56-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
In this paper, we describe a video- and case-based software designed to help pre-service teachers become skilled teachers of literacy, and how this software was used in one pre-service education course. We present the results of one evaluation study that seeks to understand the extent to which video-case experiences helped pre-service teachers to acquire knowledge, analyze classroom situations, and develop these skills within the context of actual classrooms. We introduce methodology that has participants talk about literacy practices they see in target video clips as a means of assessing their knowledge and analytic skills. Using case studies of pre-service teachers who used the video-case software, and those who did not, we show that our video rich, case-based approach shows promise for the professional development of pre-service literacy teachers.
Phillips, M.M., Koehler, M.J., Zhang, G., Yadav, A. & Rosaen, C. (2005). Results of an Experiment Evaluating the Use of Video Cases to Help Pre-Service Teachers Become Better Teachers of Literacy. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2005--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 585-592). Montreal, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 20, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/20145/.
© 2005 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- Brophy, J. (2004). Using video in teacher education: Advances in research on teaching. London, UK: Elsevier, Ltd.
- Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2-10.
- Lampert, M., & Ball, D.L. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Lundeberg, M.A., Levin, B.B., & Harrington, H.L. (1999). Who learns what from cases and how: The research base for teaching and learning with cases. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Koehler, M.J. (2002). Designing case-based hypermedia for developing understanding of children’s mathematical reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 20(2), 151-195.
- Merseth, K.K. (1999). Foreword: A rationale for case-based pedagogy in teacher education. In M.A. Lundeberg, B.B. Levin& H.L. Harrington (Eds.). Who learns what from cases and how: The research base for teaching and learning with cases (pp. Ix-xvi). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
- Williams, S.M. (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 (4), 367–427.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.
Tonya Tripp & Charles Graham, Brigham Young University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (Mar 02, 2009) pp. 216–218
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.