Solution strategies and adaptivity in multidigit division in a choice/no-choice experiment: Student and instructional factors
ARTICLE
Marije F. Fagginger Auer, Marian Hickendorff, Cornelis M. van Putten, Leiden University
Learning and Instruction Volume 41, Number 1, ISSN 0959-4752 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Abstract
Adaptive expertise in choosing when to apply which solution strategy is a central element of current day mathematics, but may not be attainable for all students in all mathematics domains. In the domain of multidigit division, the adaptivity of choices between mental and written strategies appears to be problematic. These solution strategies were investigated with a sample of 162 sixth graders in a choice/no-choice experiment. Children chose freely when to apply which strategy in the choice condition, but not in the no-choice conditions for mental and written calculation, so strategy performance could be assessed unbiasedly. Mental strategies were found to be less accurate but faster than written ones, and lower ability students made counter-adaptive choices between the two strategies. No teacher effects on strategy use were found. Implications for research on individual differences in adaptivity and the feasibility of adaptive expertise for lower ability students are discussed.
Citation
Fagginger Auer, M.F., Hickendorff, M. & van Putten, C.M. (2016). Solution strategies and adaptivity in multidigit division in a choice/no-choice experiment: Student and instructional factors. Learning and Instruction, 41(1), 52-59. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved September 24, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/199792/.
This record was imported from
Learning and Instruction
on January 29, 2019.
Learning and Instruction is a publication of Elsevier.