Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?
Learning and Instruction Volume 20, Number 4 ISSN 0959-4752 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Peer-feedback content is a core component of peer assessment, but the impact of various contents of feedback is hardly studied. Participants in the study were 89 graduate students who were assigned to four experimental and a control group. Experimental groups received a scenario with concise general (CGF) or elaborated specific (ESF) feedback by a high or low competent peer. ESF by a high competent peer was perceived as more adequate, but led to more negative affect. Students in CGF groups outperformed ESF groups during treatment. Groups with a low competent peer outperformed groups with a high competent peer during the posttest. Feedback perceptions and performance were uncorrelated.
Strijbos, J.W., Narciss, S. & Dünnebier, K. Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 291-303. Elsevier Ltd.
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Ruby Vurdien, White Rose Language School, Valladolid, Spain
International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching Vol. 7, No. 2 (April 2017) pp. 1–21
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.