You are here:

Civic Education in United States: A Multiple Regression of Civic Education Scores from the National Assessment of Educational Progress
article

,

Research in Social Sciences and Technology Volume 1, Number 2, ISSN 2468-6891 e-ISSN 2468-6891 Publisher: Research in Social Sciences and Technology

Full Text

Abstract

Social studies teachers instruct their students through a variety of instructional pedagogies. Social science education researchers have called for K-12 teachers to transition away from a traditional lecture format and move towards a format that encourages critical thinking. Classroom debates of controversial issues are a common method by which teachers engage students in higher-order thinking. This research study utilizes the 2010 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 12th grade civics assessment (n = 9,800) to identify instructional techniques that improve student’s score. Utilizing the NAEP Data Explorer online statistical analysis tool, a linear regression was conducted examining the effects of race, socio-economic status, instructional pedagogies, and access to newspapers and computers on student performance. Results show that discussing current events, at any frequency, increases student performance. Students who participated in classroom debates once or twice a month or less also improved. African-American and Hispanic students scored lower, as did students who qualified for free and reduced lunches. This study suggests that the inclusion of current events should be encouraged civics classes.

Citation

Bittman, B. & Russell, W. (2016). Civic Education in United States: A Multiple Regression of Civic Education Scores from the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 1(2),. Retrieved December 10, 2023 from .

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Campbell, D.E. (2008). Voice in the classroom: How an open classroom climate fosters political engagement among adolescents. Political Behavior, 30(4), 437-454.
  2. Condon, M., & Holleque, M. (2013). Entering politics: General self-efficacy and voting behavior among young people. Political Psychology, 34(2), 167-181,
  3. Dalton, R.J. (2013). The apartisan American. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publishing.
  4. Delli Carpini, M.X, & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
  5. Dostie-Goulet, E. (2009). Social networks and the development of political interest. Journal of Youth Studies, 12(4), 405-421,
  6. Ehman, L.H. (1980). The American school in the political socialization process. Review of Educational Research, 50(1), 99-119. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170032
  7. Galston, W.A. (2004). Civic education and political participation. PS: Political Science and Politics, 37(2), 263-266.
  8. Hess, D. (2004). Discussion in the social studies: Is it worth the trouble? Social Education,68(2), 206-212.
  9. Hess, D.E., & McAvoy, P. (2015). The political classroom. New York, NY: Routledge.
  10. Humphries, M., Muller, C., & Schiller, K.S. (2013). The political socialization of adolescent immigrant youth. Social Science Quarterly, 94(5), 1261-1282,
  11. Ichilov, O. (2007). Civic knowledge of high school students in Israel: Personal and contextual determinants. International Society of Political Psychology, 28(4), 417440.
  12. Johnson, T., & Kaye, B. (2003). A boost or bust for democracy? How the web influences political attitudes and behaviors in the 1996 and 2000 presidential elections. Press/Politics, 8, 9–34.
  13. Kahn, J., Crow, D., & Lee, N-J. (2013). Different pedagogy, different politics: High school learning opportunities and youth political engagement. Political Psychology, 34(3),419-441,
  14. Kelly-Woessner, A., & Woessner, M. (2008). Conflict in the classroom: Considering the effects of partisan difference on political education. Journal of Political Science Education, 4(3), 265-285,
  15. Kittilson, M.C., & Dalton, R.J. (2011). Virtual civil society: The new frontier of social capital? Political Behavior, 33, 625-644,
  16. Knowles, R.T., & McCafferty-Wright, J. (2015). Connecting an open classroom climate to social movement citizenship: A study of 8th graders in Europe using IEA ICCS data. Journal of Social Studies Research, 39, 255-269,
  17. Martens, A.M., & Gainous, J. (2013). Civic education and democratic capacity: How to teachers teach and what works. Social Science Quarterly, 94(4), 956-976,
  18. Merryfield, M.M. (2011). Global Education: Responding to a Changing World. In W.B. Russell III (Ed.), Contemporary social studies: An essential reader (pp. 97-116).
  19. National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The nation's report card: Civics 2010. National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4, 8, and 12. NCES 2011-Bittman & Russell III Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 1(2), 1-16 466. National Center For Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519208.pdf
  20. Niemi, R.G., & Junn, J. (1998). Civic education: What makes students learn. New Haven,CN: Yale University Press.
  21. Niemi, R.G., & Sobieszek, B.I. (1977). Political socialization. Annual Review of Sociology,3(1), 209-233.
  22. Neudorf, A., Niemi, R.G., & Smets, K. (2016). The compensation effect on civic education on political engagement: How civics classes make up for missing parental socialization. Political Behavior,
  23. Parker, W.C. (2003). Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  24. Passe, J. (1988). The role of internal factors in the teaching of current events. Theory& Research in Social Education, 16(1), 83-89.
  25. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and renewal of American community. New York: Simon& Schuster.
  26. Putnam, R.D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science and Politics, 28(4), 664-683.
  27. Santora, E.D. (2011). 21st Century Democratic Social and Citizenship Education: A Hybrid Perspective. In W.B. Russell III (Ed.), Contemporary social studies: An essential reader (pp. 97-116). Charlotte, SC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
  28. Skocpol, T., & Fiorina, M.P. (Eds.). (1999). Civic engagement in American democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Bittman & Russell III Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 1(2), 1-16
  29. U.S. Department of Education. (2012). Advancing civic learning and engagement in democracy: A roadmap and call to action. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED528611.pdf
  30. Washington, E.Y., & Humphries, E.K. (2011). A social studies teacher’s sensemaking of controversial issues discussions of race in a predominantly White, rural high school classroom. Theory& Research in Social Education, 39(1), 92-114.
  31. Waters, S., & Russell, W.B. III. (2011). Character, Moral, and Values Education: The Foundation of Effective Citizenship. In W.B. Russell III (Ed.), Contemporary social studies: An essential reader (pp. 97-116). Charlotte, SC: Information Age
  32. Wicks, R.H., Wicks, J.L., Morimoto, S.A., Maxwell, A., & Schulte, S.R. (2014). Correlates of political and civic engagement among youth during the 2012 presidential campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(5), 622-644,
  33. Wilkenfeld, B. & Tourney-Purta, J. (2012). Across-context analysis of civic engagement linking CIVED and U.S. Census data. Journal of Social Science Education, 11(1), 6480.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References