Evaluating Games-Based Learning
Thomas Hainey, Thomas Connolly, University of the West of Scotland, United Kingdom
IJVPLE Volume 1, Number 1, ISSN 1947-8518 Publisher: IGI Global
A highly important part of software engineering education is requirements collection and analysis, one of the initial stages of the Software Development Lifecycle. No other conceptual work is as difficult to rectify at a later stage or as damaging to the overall system if performed incorrectly. As software engineering is a field with a reputation for producing graduate engineers who are ill-prepared for real-life software engineering contexts, this paper suggests that traditional educational techniques (e.g. role-play, live-through case studies and paper-based case studies) are insufficient in themselves. In an attempt to address this problem we have developed a games-based learning application to teach requirements collection and analysis at the tertiary education level. One of the main problems with games-based learning is that there is a distinct lack of empirical evidence supporting the approach. This paper will describe the evaluation of the requirements collection and analysis process using a newly developed framework for the evaluation of games-based learning and will focus on evaluation from a pedagogical perspective.
Hainey, T. & Connolly, T. (2010). Evaluating Games-Based Learning. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 1(1), 57-71. IGI Global. Retrieved May 29, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/185570/.
ReferencesView References & Citations Map
- Amory, A. (2006). Game object model version II: A theoretical framework for educational game development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(1), 51–77. Doi:10.1007/s11423006-9001-xAmory,A.,Naicker,K.,Vincent,J., & Adams, C.
- Cashin, W.E. (1985). Improving lectures idea paper No. 14. Manhattan: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.
- Connolly, T.M., Stansfield, M.H., & Hainey, T. (2007). An application of games-based learning within software engineering. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 416–428.
- Connolly, T.M., Stansfield, M.H., & Hainey, T. (2009) Towards the development of a games-based learning evaluation framework. In T.M. Connolly, M. Stansfield, & L. Boyle (Eds.), Games-based
- Davis, B.G. (2001). Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- De Freitas, S. (2006). Learning in immersive worlds. Joint Information Systems Committee. Retrieved May 27, 2009, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/Documents/programmes/elearninginnovation/gamingreport_v3.pdf
- Baker, E.L., & Mayer, T.E. (1999). Computerbased assessment of problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 269–282. Doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(1999)00023-0
- De Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated. Computers& Education. 46(3), 249-264.
- Bonwell, C.C. (1996). Enhancing the lecture: Revitalizing a traditional format. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 67, 31-44.
- Instructional Methods Information Website, A.D.P.R.I.M.A. (2009). Retrieved 21 May, 2009, from http://www.adprima.com/teachmeth.htm
- Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco: BerrettKoehler.
- Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Laurillard, D. (1996, June). Keynote speech at the ACM SIGCSE/SIGCUE Conference, Barcelona.
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. UK: University of Cambridge Press. Maguire, M., Elton, E., Osman, Z., & Nicolle, C. (2006). Design of a virtual learning environment for students with special needs. Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, 2(1), 119–153.
- O’Neil, H.F., Wainess, R., & Baker, E.L. (2005). Classification of learning outcomes: evidence from the computer games literature. Curriculum Journal, 16(4), 455–474.
- Whitehill, B.V. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes a review of research. Simulation& Gaming, 23(3), 261–276.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.Suggest Corrections to References