You are here:

Gender, school and class wise differences in level of Digital literacy among secondary school students in Pakistan
ARTICLE

Issues and Trends in Educational Technology Volume 6, Number 2, Publisher: University of Arizona Libraries

Abstract

The survey was conducted to assess the level of digital literacy among private secondary school students in Pakistan. A total of 344 students of grade 9 and 10 from three private schools were involved in this study. The descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal- Wallis test are used to analyze digital literacy. The study revealed that majority of students possesses adequate level of digital literacy; students demonstrated high level of skills in mobile usage and showed low level of skills in preventing computer from viruses. Moreover, the analysis showed insignificant difference in terms of the students’ digital literacy between male and female and between grade 9 and 10. However, significant difference is found in terms of digital literacy between the schools. Findings indicate students’ proficiency in digital literacy and points to the importance of developing strategies at policy and school level to help students exploit technological resources in a purposeful, safe and meaningful way.

Citation

Jan, S. (2018). Gender, school and class wise differences in level of Digital literacy among secondary school students in Pakistan. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 6(2),. University of Arizona Libraries. Retrieved January 23, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Aviram, R. & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2006). Towards a theory of digital literacy: three scenarios for the next steps. European Journal of Open Distance E-Learning,9(1), 1-11. Retrieved May 23, 2017 from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Aharon_Aviram.htm
  2. Ba, H., Tally, W., & Tsikalas, K. (2002). Investigating children’s emerging digital literacies. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 1(4), 4–47. Retrieved September 29, 2017 from http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/ View/1670/1510
  3. Berge, O., Hatlevik, O.E., Klovstad, V., Ottestad, G., Skaug, J.H. (2009). ITU Monitor 2009. Oslo: Network for IT Research and Competence in Education. Retrieved May 16, 2017 from https://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/idi/material/2009/MIS2009_w5.pdf
  4. Brindley, S. (2000). ‘ICT and Literacy’, In: N. Gamble& N. Easingwold (Eds.) Information and Communications Technology, Media, Reading and Writing, London,Continuum
  5. Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital Literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 13(1), 93106. Retrieved November 4, 2016 from http://www.openu.ac.il/personal_sites/Download/Digital-literacy2004-JEMH.pdf
  7. Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Hamburger, A.Y. (2004). Experiments in digital literacy. Cyber Psychology& Behavior, 7(4), 421-429. Retrieved November 21, 2016 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ce06/4a8f618a575e32e683c161a60f7a56c9acdd.pdf
  8. Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: Wiley.
  9. Government of Pakistan (2000). National Curriculum: Computer Science Classes IX-X,Islamabad, Ministry of Education (Curriculum Wing) Government of Pakistan (1998-2010). The Pakistan National Education Policy,Islamabad, Ministry of Education (Curriculum Wing)
  10. Hargittai, E. (2005). Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Issues and Trends in Educational Technology 15 Volume 6, Number 1, May 2018
  11. Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80 (1), 92-113.
  12. Loveless, A., Taylor, T. & Millwood, R. (2001). Creative Uses of Digital Technology: Developing Visual Literacy And ICT Capability. In J. Price, D. Willis, N. Davis &J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2001--Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2376-2380). Norfolk, VA:
  13. Nusche, D, Earl, L, Maxwell, W. & Shewbridge, C. (2011). OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education, Norway. Retrieved Nov 13, 2016 from https://www.udir.no/globalassets/upload/5/oecd_evaluering.pdf
  14. OECD (2011). PISA 2009 Results: Digital Technologies and Performance (Volume VI). Retrieved September 4, 2016 from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/Pisaproducts/48270093.pdf
  15. Shuel, T.J. & Farber, S.L. (2001). Students’ perceptions of technology use in college Issues and Trends in Educational Technology 16 Volume 6, Number 1, May 2018
  16. Teck, S.H. And Y.L. Lai (2011). An empirical analysis of Malaysian pre-university students’ ICT competency gender differences. International Journal of Network Mobile Technology, 2, 15-29.
  17. Umar, I.N., & Jalil, N.A. (2012). ICT skills, practices and barriers of its use among secondary school students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5672– 5676.
  18. UNESCO (2016). Global Education Monitoring Report. Retrieved May 23, 2017 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002459/245918E.pdf
  19. UNISEF (2011). Policy brief. Digital literacy in education. Retrieved November 11, 2016 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002144/214485e.pdf
  20. Varank, I. (2007). Effectiveness of quantitative skills, qualitative skills, and gender in determining computer skills and attitude: A causal analysis, clearinghouse. A Journal of Educational Strategies,81(2),71-80. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.81.2.71-80
  21. Zhong, Z. (2011). From access to usage: The divide of self-reported digital skills among adolescents. Computers and Education, 56(3), 736-746.doi: https://doi.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.