You are here:

Reflections of Designers of an Online Orientation Program: Did We Get it Right?
PROCEEDING

, University of Calgary, Canada ; , University of Melbourne, Australia ; , , , University of Calgary, Canada

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-35-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Abstract

With the growth of online courses and programs offered by higher education, are students given formal orientation opportunities? The authors engaged in a two-year study where they implemented an online orientation program for students in their faculty. The program was designed to develop student confidence and competence in using the technology and becoming familiar with online pedagogy. Using a reflective process the authors, who have a wealth of experience with online learning (e.g., student, designer, instructors, & administrator) share insights from their experiences with this online orientation initiative. They conclude the work with three implications for practice.

Citation

Hanson, J., Johnson, C., Lock, J., Adlington, A. & Liu, Y. (2018). Reflections of Designers of an Online Orientation Program: Did We Get it Right?. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1233-1240). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 18, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Allen, I.E. & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Needham, MA: Sloan-C. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529699.pdf
  2. Allen, I.E. & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group, e-Literate, and WCE. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580868.pdf
  3. Bates, T. (2016). A national survey of university online and distance learning in Canada. Retrieved from https://www.tonybates.ca/2016/03/23/a-national-survey-of-university-online-and-distance-learning-incanada/
  4. Bates, T. (Ed.) (2017). Tracking online and distance education in Canadian Universities and Colleges: 2017. Vancouver BC: The National Survey of Online and Distance Education in Canadian Post-Secondary Education. Retrieved from https://onlinelearningsurveycanada.ca/
  5. Coia, L., & Taylor, M. (2009). Co/autoethnography: Exploring our teaching selves collaboratively. In Research methods for the self-study of practice (pp. 3-16). Springer, Dordrecht.
  6. Dewey, J. (2015). John Dewey Quotes. Retrieved from http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/664197-we-do-not-learnfrom-experience-we-learn-from-reflecting
  7. Feldman, A., Paugh, P., & Mills, G. (2004). Self-study through action research. In International handbook of selfstudy of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 943-977). Springer, Dordrecht.
  8. Fredericksen, E. (2017). A national study of online learning leaders in US higher education. Online Learning 21(2),
  9. Hamilton, M.L., Smith, L., & Worthington, K. (2008). Fitting the methodology with the research: An exploration of narrative, self-study, & Auto-ethnography. Studying Teacher Education, 4(1), 17–28.
  10. LaBoskey, V.K. (2004). Afterword moving the methodology of self-study research and practice forward: Challenges and opportunities. In International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 1169-1184). Springer, Dordrecht.
  11. Lock, J., Eaton, S.E., & Kessy, E. (2017). Fostering self-regulation in online learning in K-12 education. Northwest Journal of Teacher Education, 12 (2).
  12. Lunenberg, M., & Samaras, A.P. (2011). Developing a pedagogy for teaching self-study research: Lessons learned across the Atlantic. Teaching and teacher education, 27(5), 841-850.
  13. Meyer, A., Rose, D.H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. Wakefield, MA: CAS.
  14. Miles, M.B., Huberman, M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  15. National Centre for Universal Design for Learning at CAST Website. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/whatisudl
  16. Pinnegar, S., & Hamilton, M.L. (2009). Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research: Theory, methodology, and practice (Vol. 8). Springer Science & Business Media.
  17. Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  18. Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.