You are here:

Video re-use in mathematics teacher education

, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, United States ; , , , University of Michigan, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Washington, D.C., United States ISBN 978-1-939797-32-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


This study examines the re-use of existing video records of practice (VRPs) in preservice mathematics teacher education. The research is based on 34 interviews with mathematics teacher educators from 24 different institutions across the United States and three other countries, who are re-using VRPs from online repositories, books with accompanying videos, and other online and offline sources. In this paper, we report on three different types of VRP re-use raised by our interview participants. We discuss the instructional goals they described as well as the learning activities in which the VRPs were used. This paper takes up the following questions: How do mathematics teacher educators make use of existing VRPs to support the professional learning of preservice teachers? What instructional goals do teacher educators try to achieve when re-using VRPs? In what types of activities did they re-use VRPs? The paper concludes with a discussion of what these findings mean for teacher educators who re-use VRPs as well as for those who produce VRPs that can be re-used in preservice teacher education.


Suzuka, K., Frank, R., Crawford, E. & Yakel, E. (2018). Video re-use in mathematics teacher education. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 329-336). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Bacevich, A.E. (2010). Building Curriculum for Teacher Education: A Study of Video Records of Practice. Retrieved from,H.,Usiskin,Z.,Burrill,G.,NationalResearchCouncil(U.S.),MathematicalSciencesEducationBoard,&UnitedStatesNationalCommissiononMathematicsInstruction(Eds.).(2002).StudyingClassroomTeachingasaMediumforProfessionalDevelopmentProceedingsofaU.S.-JapanWorkshop.Washington,DC:NationalAcademyPress.Retrievedfrom
  2. Biberstine, R.D. (1971). The Utilization of Videotape Equipment in Teacher Education. Contemporary Education, 42(5), 217. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2013). Ensuring Fair and Reliable Measures of Effective Teaching: Culminating Findings from the MET Project’s Three-Year Study (Policy and Practice Brief) (P. 26). Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Retrieved from
  3. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M.E. (2008). Video as a Tool for Fostering Productive Discussions in Mathematics Professional Development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417–436.
  4. Brouwer, C.N. (2011). Imaging Teacher Learning. A Literature Review on the Use of Digital Video for Preservice Teacher Education and Professional Development. Presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  5. Burleigh, J.C., & Peterson, H.W. (1967). Videotapes in Teacher Education. The Elementary School Journal, 68(1), 35–38.
  6. Brunvand, S. (2010). Best Practices for Producing Video Content for Teacher Education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 247–256.
  7. Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video Viewing in Teacher Education and Professional Development: A Literature Review. Educational Research Review, 16(2015), 41–67. , A.D., & Kane, T.J. (2013). The Reliability of Classroom Observations by School Personnel. Research Paper. MET Project (Research Paper). Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Retrieved from
  8. Holsti, O.R. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. Retrieved from Janík, T., Seidel, T., & Najvar, P. (2009). Introduction: On the Power of Video Studies in Investigating Teaching and Learning. In T. Janík & T. Seidel (Eds.), The Power of Video Studies in Investigating Teaching and Learning in the Classroom (pp. 7–22).
  9. Pecheone, R., & Wei, R.C. (2011). The Performance Assessment for California Teachers: A Policy Case Study of Teacher Work Sampling. In H.C. Rosselli, M. Girod, & M. Brodsky (Eds.), Connecting Teaching and Learning: History, Evolution, and Case Studies of Teacher Work Sample Methodology (pp. 187–206). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  10. Rook, M.M., & McDonald, S.P. (2012). Digital Records of Practice: A Literature Review of Video Analysis in Teacher Practice (Vol. 2012, pp. 1441–1446). Presented at the Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference.
  11. Seago, N., Jacobs, J., & Driscoll, M. (2010). Transforming Middle School Geometry: Designing Professional Development Materials That Support the Teaching and Learning of Similarity. Middle Grades Research Journal, 5(4), 199+.
  12. Sherin, M.G., & Sherin, B.L. (2007). Research on How People Learn with and from Video. In S.J. Derry (Ed.), Guidelines for Video Research in Education: Recommendations from an Expert Panel (pp. 47–58). Chicago, IL: Data Research and
  13. Van Es, E.A., & Sherin, M.G. (2010). The Influence of Video Clubs on Teachers’ Thinking and Practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 155–176. Https://,E.(2003).TeacherProfessional Development: An International Review of the Literature. Paris: UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning.
  14. Virtual Learning Community. (2018). About the VLC. Retrieved October 10, 2017, from Acknowledgements

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact